Easy to be wise after the event

Come on people. He's had one good game against a team who are, by some distance, the worst in the league. If he was playing week in, week out at that level he would most definitely already be signed up on a new 2 year deal and probably be made captain as well...

But how many games has he played in the last seasons?

If the Bulls had offered him a fresh deal last week, and then he'd got crocked playing against Celtic, I wonder if the same people now saying they are disgusted with the club for getting rid would be coming on complaining that we were keeping someone who is always injured?

Damned if they do, damned if they don't, I would suggest

Which, sadly, is the right answer...

I can only see that we are getting rid of him due to quota space for i would take Glenn playing 6 matches for every 12 that Langley plays every single time...that also counts for Worrincey who quite frankly looks like he's never played the game half the time.

Your other problem is that I guess Glenn costs maybe twice (or more) what Langley does, and maybe four times what Worro does?

But, I'd argue, he gets through twice the work of Langley and maybe four times what Worro does

Can't argue with that I suppose. I will be disappointed if his Quota space isn't used up well on a quality player, or he will indeed be a big loss.

If Glenn wasnt using a Quota space i dont think the money would be an issue.

You're probably right but I wouldn't be surprised to see there being a cock-up and us being left with a quota space anyway.

But if he's on four times the money of Worrincy, he'd have to be doing 16 times the amount of work, since he's only playing in one out of every four games

Or something like that