Quote ="mystic eddie"I suppose if you did not jump to conclusions so much you would not be as wrong so often. My point is simply that if that is the type of players we are looking at, then Raynor would be a better shout than Reardon, IMO.
'"
Why though? You're entitled to your opinion of course, but it just seems quite an odd one to me.
[u
Reardon
[/u
Positive
Homegrown: So helping to meet the minimum requirements unlike Raynor.
Age:28, almost four years younger than Raynor.
Experience: Played at International level and GF experience. Former Bull and local lad playing for his hometown club. Has a point to prove after recent off field issues.
Salary: Won't be a top earner.
Negatives
Recent injury troubles
Comes with a slightly damaged reputation.
Raynor has a court case lingering over him (who knows what might happen there), is almost 4 years older and has also had some recent injury problems. He wouldn't count as homegrown.
What are his positives over Reardon ME?