Hark at you with your fair-minded and non confrontational post.

Maybe it is, I'd forgotten about Evans. I was just going on the stink from Widnes last year with Hock and the games against Wigan.

Excellent news, I'd have been happy at this point to have him month to month, but a season long loan is a bonus.

Ban him anyway.

He's charged with a Grade C offence of failing to conform with stereotypical expectations of animosity toward a neighbouring Rugby League Team. He has until 6pm to put in an early guilty plea.

Excellent news!! Gives us some sort of fighting chance. Been very I pressed with Mullally.

Think it will benefit the Giants long term. He's a young prop who shows potential, but sill has sole rough edges to iron out, hard to do this in CC or playing for Guants once every couple of months when a player is I hired it suspended.

Over moon to have him for year!

great news. does that mean we are out of special measures as I thought we weren't allowed to sign anyone for longer than a month

Don't think he is 'signed', the word is "loaned".

Yes will be eligible for both upcoming games with the Giants, only reason he is in-eligible on a month loan i would assume is to stop him from being "cup tied" and/or maybe a conflict of interest - i think ??

Given the way our forwards were steamrollered on Sunday this loan deal is very welcome. I hope more follow.

He is actually with you week on week. He can be recalled at a weeks notice. A genuine season long loan would prohibit such a recall.

This will almost certainly mean that mullers will not play versus the Giants.

I am sure Bulls fans will be hoping the Giants forwards stay fit and on top form for 2014 !

Bulls website says he can be recalled as part of 24-hour return clause.

So we no more "have him for the season" that we did when he was on a month by month loan? Just spin then?

Rolling loan?

He needs the games and we need him - I'll even go and pick him up every week if it eases the deal..

Isn't that how season loans always work? On a month loan, no recall, but on a season loan there is the option.

He'll gather no moss so that's one positive.

Look I may be being thick here but what is the point in a season long loan then? A month by month loan lets you know he's here for 3 or 4 games at a time and can be renewed again and again. A season loan actually makes it far easier to recall him?

That just makes no sense a season long loan should be a season long loan, may as well have him on a month to month basis as pumpetypump said above !!

No, a genuine season long loan would preclude any recall for the whole season (though it could still specify a player cannot play against his registered club)

No, I think you have him for the season providing none of Crabtree, Kopczak or Kaufusi gets a long term injury, which from the lending clubs perspective seems reasonable.

I am not 100% certain but believe the Giants are picking up the entirety of his salary (all parent clubs are doing so for your current monthly loanees). Setting recent fan antipathy aside at club level it seems Giants along with Wire, Wigan and Leeds are on your side.

Yet we have to produce proof of cash for loans?

Suspect that's reason it's a rolling loan with hudds having 24hr recall rather than a true season long loan. Lets us work around the special measures in short term

I honestly dislike what I've read from both sets of fans. I think the handbags need to be put away and let the players do the talking.
I for different reasons would like to see the Bulls get relegated. I certainly don't want to see you to suffer like you have.
With the new system in place for next season, to have a team with a big name like yourselves in the lower league will be good for the sport.
It will be great for the bulls to start again, have a fresh start with a new owner I hope. Build up to be a force and earn the respect from other fans again.
Genuine good luck to your club.

Here here



Not here here

I think he would do well at the united nations or maybe as an ambassador......no, really..