I think we're all missing the real issue here - the fact that this newspaper (magazine?) features topless photos of innocent rugby players. I mean, are we still in the 1970's here for God's sake? These homosexual chaps need to realise that it's 2011 and treating rugby players like sex objects is just not on.

We should be praising Elliot for being a crusader against such outdated nonsense. He, like me, was just disappointed that Stuart Reardon has allowed himself to used as a sex object by the readers of this rag.

here here

Well I have heard the club are taking steps and that Whitehead will be making amends through volunteer work.

Apparently they've got him working in the packing department for a large confectioners. He'll be working to make sure that the fudge is placed in the shipping boxes correctly.

They're also having him help out with a local music charity. He'll be teaching under-privileged kids to play the pink oboe.

After that he'll be working in a 2 story clothing warehouse taking shirts up to the 2nd floor.

Oh, I am p1ssing myself with laughter.

Will he also be practising the reverse trombone?

I'll explain that to you if you want, I suspect you won't understand.

Bigoted piece of shoite.

Where where? Idiot

You DO realise that you can be taken to court for being so bigoted, don't you?

I really do despair.

I will challenge bigoted idiots like you any day of the year.

Get over yourself. They're just jokes.

Ha ha flipping ha,


You do realise you can be prosecuted for your "jokes", don't you?

Well that isn't true but ok

What isn't true?

Is it ok to make homophopic remarks online?

I suspect you are mistaken.

Who here has made a Homophobic remark or a slur. Why haven't you gone off on one about the jokes made about gingers when what has been said on this thread is worse than any gay remark? And i'm not a ginger extremist by the way dark hair and proud ha

@billypop.

Please explain how my post was homophobic. Then recommend me a good lawyer and tell him about these new laws that exist only in your mind. Then go back to rocking in your corner.

Isn't it OK to insult homosexuals (and Ginners for that matter) as long as you give them a handshake before you leave the forum?

Really? What law have I broken to be prosecuted? The Making Crap Up To Look Important and Knowledgeable Law of 1996 perhaps?

Also, why aren't guys like Jimmy Carr locked up? Surely they're just as "guilty" as me. Oh wait, it's because you're talking out of your backside.

It'd be a bit of a bummer to end up in court over posts made on here.

Idiot.

Ah, so because I called you out on your clearly made up "you can be prosecuted" nonesense, [iI'm[/i the idiot.


Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

It's not funny.

Perhaps not to you. But your opinion by itself does not mean the rest of the world must go along with it.

Haha - Like

I thought they were hillarious. Well done.

Can you fooooooook!!!!!!

Well this as brought out a range of opinion. It proves one thing to me and that is that homosexuals are the ones with homophobia and that is not suprising as they do have a condition to be phobic about.
Reminds of that classic statement/joke by either Dave King or Mike Reid in the 1970's "There seem to be more "homosexuals every year! How do they breed?