Personally I thought Langley was very good Vs Huddersfield, he got through a tonne of work in attack and defence.

But yes, pretty much the scoreline would be what matters. Hell, we had enough 2 point defeats last season. I didn't go away feeling glad about the metres made.

Only if I can cash in mine from 18 months ago about Worrincy being god awful

who did we play on sunday then?

Shame everyone doesn't see what me and you see, extremely underrated because of the work he quietly ticks along with!

That's because Hull were playing Saints, who couldn't tackle their way out of a paper bag on Saturday night. So I wouldn't worry about that stat.

The only stat fans remember a year down the line.

Stats are like mini-skirts. They look good but hide all the important bits.

Like I said the scoreline is the only stat that I'm interested in. The situation above would suggest a close fought defeat. Still a defeat though and someone else walking off with the two competition points. The coaches should be able to tell who's best for the team from what they see in a match and in training. Personally you could see Langley getting stuck in with the tackling last Friday.

Scorelines are like anything else though you can't take them in isolation. Personally I'd give it ten games before making comments about the squad and/or coach.