Quote ="The Biff"Stats should be taken with a pinch of salt and perspective. For example, using super league.co.uk, to create game averages. Irrespective of minutes on the field.
Not much in it at all. But it could be argued that Bryn is doing the same job for half the money (I would presume) and is far more reliable/less injury prone having been fit for selection twice as much as Langely. So maybe get rid of Langely, move Bryn to loose (2 try assists already at prop, could be developed?) and get in a house prop to bring back the biff!! Please not Bailey tho...not a fan.
But in all seriousness...there's nothing wrong with the pack. Look at how they dominated Huddersfield, I'd keep them all. In my opinion the problem this season has been with the halves and three quarters, the lack of leaders and the lack of a cohesive team of 13 playing to a gameplan/set of tactics.'"
my stats were standardised, but not necessarily per game as you have done. your total distance per game will be affected by the amount of time on the pitch far more than the metres made per carry. I usually standardise missed tackles a game as a % of total numbers of tackles per game, which when taken with that total tells you both how much and how well they are tackling. And Jamie on these scores even when he has had all the injury problems this season is better than Bryn, so that is what I would want - a fully fit Jamie Langley (who is passing the ball more as Potter claims in the Hull KR Bullseye). and again to compare a fitter langley with Bryn, go back to the SL stats and compare Langley for 2010 against Bryn for 2011 where the gap is much bigger. or go back to 2004 and 05 to see how far Bryn would have to develop to get anywhere near a fit and more creative than defensive Langley. and if I were to convert a prop it would be Koppy as his are far better than Bryns on the offensive front.
