Quote ="mat" suspect we're playing him their more through necessity than choice. That said I'd prefer us to either play royston there ('"
See, this is the problem I'm having fathoming out Mick Potter's strategy here. It [iwasn't[/i necessary at all yesterday.
Pretty well everyone else apart from him thinks it would have made more sense yesterday to have Royston in the centre and Ah Van on the wing. But we ended up with both of them playing out of position. Even when Kearney went off, it was Ah Van, not Royston, that dropped into full back.
Even the pre-match announcer gave out Ah Van on the wing and Royston in the centres
Why not play people in their best positions?