SAINTS have announced their 19-man squad for Friday's First Utility Super League Round Three clash with Castleford Tigers.

Lance Hohaia, Greg Richards and Matty Dawson are added to the '19' with Jordan Turner, Paul Wellens and Andre Savelio missing out.

Keiron Cunningham will choose from:

1. Jonny Lomax, 2. Tommy Makinson, 4. Josh Jones, 5. Adam Swift, 6. Travis Burns, 8. Mose Masoe, 9. James Roby, 10. Kyle Amor, 11. Atelea Vea, 12. Jon Wilkin, 13. Louie McCarthy-Scarsbrook, 14. Alex Walmsley, 15. Mark Flanagan, 16. Lance Hohaia, 17. Mark Percival, 18. Luke Thompson, 19. Greg Richards, 21. Joe Greenwood, 22. Matty Dawson.

Still no Walsh?

He is becoming a sick note?
Considering he's been back in training and only had a virus (cold) last week what's up now?

Lomax
Makinson Percival Jones Swift
Burns Wilkin
Amor Roby Walmsley
Greenwood Vea
LMS

Hohaia Thompson Richards Masoe

Time for redemption.

1. Jonny Lomax,
2. Tommy Makinson,
17. Mark Percival,
22. Matty Dawson.
5. Adam Swift,
6. Travis Burns,
12. Jon Wilkin,
8. Mose Masoe, 9. James Roby, 10. Kyle Amor,
11. Atelea Vea, 21. Joe Greenwood,
4. Josh Jones,

14. Alex Walmsley, 18. Luke Thompson, 19. Greg Richards, 13. Louie McCarthy-Scarsbrook,

Lomax
Makinson Percival Jones Swift
Burns Wilkin
Walmsley Roby Amor
Vea Greenwood
Flash

Thompson, LMS, Mose, Lance

Lomax
Tommy mac
Percy
Jones
Dawson

Burns
Lance
Jones
Wilkin LMS
Amore Robes Walmsley


Thompson Richards Greenwood Flanners.

KC is doing so well with the not picking Wello thing. Good start from him despite the result at the weekend.

Should we start Lomax at 6 and Tommy to full back until Walsh is back?
Only that would mean Dawson on the wing?

No. Nay. Never. Lomax cannot go back to the halves. Let him get used to the FB role. No need to make sweeping changes.

KC hinted that certain players needed to get things right, Lomax is one of them so he's under a bit of pressure otherwise Lance or Wellens could step in. We will have to see how he goes, attack wise he's a bit rusty but defensively he's all over the shop and struggles to read the game.

Would rather see Swift move to FB before Lance or Wellens. I think Swift > Lomax.

Beleive me he's under no pressure and he's got off field problems at the min so I think KC will understand.

With his off the field problem aside, he's only played 3 games since June.

I know its heresy but I think Swift would make a great fullback.

He is very much in the style of NRL fullbacks with pace and evasion.

He can't tackle a good dinner.

Lomax
Makinson
Percival
Jones
Swift
Burns
Wilkin
Walmsley
Roby
Amor
Vea
Greenwood
Flanagan

Hohaia
Masoe
LMS
Thompson

Can't make the game unfortunately, hopefully we can bounce back!

What are these problems everyone is banging on about with J-Lo? There was someone on Twitter the other night having a go at everyone who criticised his performance.

Should he be playing at the moment?

I can only assume that Dawson being included means he's coming into the centres for Turner. I'd personally always rather pick Jones.

A blind man on a galloping horse can see Dawson isnt good enough for a top side

You seem to have a real downer on Swift? Has he offended you in someway? You can't seriously consider Dawson as a better option?

I feel I have to challenge this in the interests of fairness. Dawson's been labelled with this "not good enough" tag since he arrived - possibly as a result of the way he arrived and the coach's comments at the time.

However, while I absolutely agree that he's no Jamie Lyon or Mal Meninga, I just don't see that he's an order of magnitude less able than Jones, Turner or even Percival at the moment. They all have on and off days, and it's not trashing Percival, for example, to say that he should really have taken two tries against Souths and occasionally seems defensively suspect. Likewise Turner can have completely anonymous games where he certainly doesn't run his size. Jones is aggressive, and perhaps the most defensively sound in the middle, but on the edges can get found out positionally, and is not exactly a top-rank attacking threat with ball in hand.

I'm not bashing them - they are what they are : solid, unexciting centres (Percival has potential to excite, but I worry he won't be big enough). As Mugwump pointed out on another thread, the salary cap prevents us from having a star pack (which we do have) AND star backs (which we don't).

So how is Dawson significantly worse ? I've seen him play plenty now, and he is not noticeably weaker in defence than the others, and not noticeably less threatening in attack than the others.

Is this a case of give a dog a bad name and confirmation bias will follow ?

I'm of the opinion that Dawson won't 'make it' at Saints, largely because I disagree with the part of your post that I've put in bold. He is solid enough in defence and has decent hands, but I think he's quite a distance behind the others you mention - particularly Percival - as an attacking player. He just doesn't strike me as having the athleticism required for a three-quarter. Jones isn't especially dynamic but he is direct and he does make breaks. Turner can be disappointing but he has upped his game so far this year (Souths game aside) and is running much harder and making plenty of ground. Percy, for me, has all the elusiveness - and, increasingly, power - of a genuinely top class centre; he just needs to put a stone on, which I suspect he will in time.

Dawson is handy to have around in situations like this, but I don't see him displacing any of the players mentioned above in the pecking order (although he might not need to displace Jones, as KC might want him in the back row).

From what I have seen of Dawson, he is much better suited to the centre than the wing.

But I think he has only played 1 or maybe 2 games at centre.

There is an element of we must bash someone. Would you rather have Dawson or Jamie Lyon (obvious answer is Jamie Lyon)..

But that's not the actual question, the question is would you rather have Dawson, Walsh, Amor and probably 1 or 2 others or (Jamie Lyon).

That is not so straight forward in Lyons favour. I think Dawson plays a valuable role the same as Jones. He is there or there abouts and if someone is off form they can be dropped and replaced. The other option is to spend a lot of cap on a squad player, which means sacrificing a player from 1-17.

I agree much better suited in the centres than the wing, he's not shy in making a fair number of metres, strong player who gives 100%. His weakness is being exposed on the wing under a high ball if he goes up a notch in performance then he could be challenging Turner and Jones for that unconvincing centre spot at the moment.

Why should I have to quantify my opinions to you.