James Roby - Grade B Dangerous Contact
Alex Walmsley - Grade B Striking

Both have EGP available. Going off the Peacock case then Walmsley won't get anything, but that would imply the disciplinary board were consistent.

I didn't see the Walmsley incident - was he provoked?

I didn't see it either but of course he was. It was Pellisier what done it (he's got a Grade B charge as well).

Only three players charged in Superleague this weekend and two of them belong to us. Great.

All 17 should be charged with impersonating a Superleague player who's club are top of the league?

Should please the Warrington Folk after "Super" Ben was suspended and moaning on about Roby would never receive a Ban

Just plead the peacock defence and he won't.

It never pleases the Good Honest Folk of Warrington to see any player on a disciplinary charge. But I bet James doesn't get a ban.

By the way you can only address Super Ben as Super Ben if you wear the Cherished Primrose & Blue. To mere mortals its Mr Westwood.

I've no idea whether he will or not, but he's probably one of the cleanest, most disciplined forward in world RL so hopefully the disciplinary will take that into account.

Shouldn't walmsley just get the £300 fine like Jamie peacock MBE ?

You'd think so seeing as he was provoked far more than JP and he was fighting two of them.

Both players were like Big Girls! it took place nowhere near the ball.

I don't think Walmsley or Pellisier should be banned. It was handbags that was settled with a sinbinning each, I'd say that's punishment enough.

I can't wait to see the outcome of these three charges after the Peacock cockup.

I agree, as you say James is one of the cleanest & disciplined players in the game.

NO! To the rest of Rugby league he is 'That Dirty Ba$%£rd'.

What Peacock cock up?

Did I miss something. Would loved to have been there.

Or are you talking about the ban, where an un distinguished disciplinary record was taken into account?

I've watched Super Ben throughout his Warrington career and I truly don't think he is a Dirty B******.
He is a rough uncompromising forward, who gives 100%in every match. He does get targeted for a bit extra of attention from opposing teams but Super Ben laughs this off like water off a Ducks back.

His reputation comes from one punch on a Pie player in last seasons Grand Final, that was seen by Sky viewers on replay but missed by the match official's.

Give over. He is as dirty as they come. Cheap shots all over the place, and some offences far worse than the one last season.

However, he is not the only player like that, who will take advantage, and he does take hits aswell. And I for one would love him in my side, whether like that or not.

Undistinguished indeed!

The only reason Peacock hasn't had bans is because in previous years a bit of biff hasn't been a banning offence!

I'd say there was some unintentional provocation.

It was off the ball and Pelissier seemed to accidentally barge into him, knocking him onto his backside. When big Jim got up, there was a bit of push and shove then a couple of punches thrown. Ref sin binned them both which should be the end of the matter.

Roby might have a case to answer but even that is doubtful.

Walmsley put a late-ish challenge on somebody after they passed, Pelissier ran into him and shoved him over, there was nothing accidental about any of it.

Hence the use of Speech Marks as I was quoting what my in-laws call him, I would never class him as super, nor will i ever class him as super!

I might consider that if Ben Westwood ever wins a Grand Final.

Roby picks up a fine, Walmsley 1 match ban.

Bloody glad we've still got Roby for Sunday but disappointed we won't have Walmsley. Our other so-called forwards will have to step up (but I won't hold my breath).