And nor do I. I'm calling it how I saw it, just like you. I'm making nothing up. And I don't care about neutrality because, when Saints play another team, I'm not a neutral! I'm a Saints fan! And I don't like to see one of our best young players needlessly taken out like that.


Well, if you want to form an accurate opinion on that kick, you need to watch the replay. I've watched it twice now (not for that tackle; just because I wanted to watch the match back). Hoffman was late, needlessly forceful and he's taken out a great young player who deserved a chance at no.6. Hoffman shoulder charged Wheeler at pace in the shoulder. Surprise, surprise, Wheeler's shoulder is now knackered.

If it was late then why wasn't it penalised? Or for that matter why wasn't it put on report?

Why wasn't the blatent forward pass called as a forward pass? It was still a forward pass even though it wasn't called. Even your coach thought so, and we all saw him think so! Just because our crap touchies/refs don't call something doesn't mean to say it didn't happen. Maybe the RFL will have something to say about it; maybe they won't. Time will tell.

The tackle should not be judged harsh because it was on a young player.It was either late or not,the fact that it was on a youngster should not come into it.

I had more issues with O'loughlins high shots than that tackle.

I agree. However, that fact that it was done on a talented young player who finally had the chance to show us what he had to offer (and it looked very good up to then) has particularly upset me.


They were all over the place, weren't they?

I loved Jammer's hit on Lima though. That was man on man, fair and square, you are mine!

I watched it again, and i'd say it was a couple of seconds late and i would also say Hoffman had no intention of charging the kick down, he went for the man. It should have been penalised and he should have had 10 minutes in the bin, IMO.

Ah good. A fan with eyes to see!

You mean like the one on Wilkin? Surprised he didn't ask the ref to put it on report

He couldn't because it was a fair tackle. The reaction of Wilkin himself and all the saints players who watched it are proof of that. Like the Graham on Lima hit, it was a huge hit but completely legal.

Some supporters need to realise this isn't football. They are athletes who take the physicality as part of their job.

There is a distinct difference between physicality and dangerous play. Thankfully, these days, this is recognised and their are rules in place to protect players.

Stop with the hate! It didn't get dealt with, so nothing will get done.

IN THE REFEREES EYES, it was ok, so it was ok.

Just because you've been living in Wire's shadow all these years:



hahaha, sorry! Had to throw that in on this board somewere!!!

Lent is over.
Have you been on the wine already?

English teacher, come on?

Do you have a life or are you really so sad that in order to make yourself feel better about yourself you follow me around the boards?



sad old git

Sad eld cock head should of been banned ages ago? He trolls every thread going

Trust me I have much better things to do than follow an unemployed teacher around.

You know the saying "Those that can do, do, those that can't teach"

And yes I have said the same thing to my daughter, even though she is good at her teaching job.

Then sod off and do whatever it is you have to do that is much better.

Go Away

Looking back at it now, i think i may have overreacted a little.

He was quite late on Wheeler but i think it was more the force of the collision than the placing of Hoffman's tackle that hurt Wheeler.

So if Jammer had damaged Lima's shoulder with his collision then that would have been ok?

Yes. Firstly, because Lima is a dirty git. Secondly, because shoulder charges on a player when they are NOT kicking the ball are legal. Thirdly, because Lima is a dirty git.

Simples.

Why did the ref give a knock-on when the ball clearly hit Deacon in the face? That changed the momentum of the game which led to Saints two late tries. If you are going to harp on about refereeing decisions then take a balanced view.

Firstly Lima isn't a dirty git. Secondly the challenge on Wheeler was legal. Thirdly Lima is not a dirty git.

If Deacon's face knocked the ball forward, then that is a knock on. Had it knocked the ball backwards, it wouldn't have been a knock on.

I disagree.

The ref didn't agree.