Quote="meninga the legend"yeah i know cookie.....badger, jay and jonh henry were my best mates at brook, cause we went to school together. did you play at brook then?'"
Just to chip in on the whole Farrell/Sculthorpe debate, since I'm struggling to concentrate on my OU.
If GB had a decent stand off, in 2001-04, I would have thought Scully at 13 and Faz at 12. Mainly because Faz would be more effective as a wide running second row. There is no mistaking Scully was the better running 13, like a large, old fashioned stand off, but Farrell had the better range of passing, kicking and was choosen as captain for a reason.
Summary Farrell was the more complete player and led a team, but Scully was exceptional at what he did. Let's face it they were both game changers and you'd have each in your dream team.
Oh and I'd go with:
Offiah - complete w@nker
Barrie Jon Mather - like Offiah, only in it for himself and never a team player.
Classic Bailey he was the ony player slagged off on here who was not a Wigan player,By the way it was not one of you lot who nicked 4 of his GF winners rings was it?
Quote="LincolnDEVILSFan"Just to chip in on the whole Farrell/Sculthorpe debate ..............
Let's face it they were both game changers and you'd have each in your dream team...............'"
Actually no ........... in my dream team Scully gets in at 12, but Hanley would be my loose forward.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.