JP is apparently having a dig at Brian Carney and Jon Wells being pundits it seems on twitter, I could be wrong as he isnt clear but this is what it has been interpreted as by others.

He is maybe a bit jealous given he can only get punditry employment with the BBC once every month or so for the odd challenge cup match.

Either way, if he is indeed having a dig at them it doesnt come across as very nice or professional. After all, who is he to criticise anyones job after the calamity he has presided over at Hull KR?

He's entitled to an opinion, same as the rest of us.

life time Leeds fan, probably as frustrated as the rest of us

and you dont know what is job is as Hull KR so you can shut right up about that, I very much doubt his first job post-playing was running the club

If it was then Hull KR are pretty stupid to hire someone with zero admin experience, hardly his fault

JP didn't seem to like a certain Mr Schofields general opinion a few years back i recall

Still OK, there's a few on here I don't particularly warm to either (and I suspect me to them) but I try to keep it civil.

Idiotic comments from Peacock illustrating why clubs should NEVER make off-field appointments based on someone's ability as a player.

Apart from when you challenge people to childish loser-must-leave-this-board showdowns

I don't mind Wells, but Carneys an idiot who can barely hide his distain for Leeds. Lost a lot of respect for him when he dipped out of his NRL contract.

JPs earned the right go have a rant, at any rate.

What a calamity KR beat Rhinos 30-10 at Headingley & Castleford 58-16 at Castleford

Twitter is the graveyard idiots go to bury themselves in.

Imagine the orgasm William would be having if Hardaker had said that.

As I pointed out on another thread, Captain Peacock played second fiddle to Vice Captain Carney during the GB Tri Nations gig down under in 2006.

They should have swapped their designated titles. That would have been a more accurate reflection of their team status.

That's not what happened. I said I would leave if I was wrong - the challenge was to see if you were as confident in understanding the stats you were using, you weren't and didn't make the same offer which was fair enough. Where was I being uncivilised.

In how it wasn't at all how you're explaining above.

Is that the same Jamie Peacock who finds it hard to string a sentence together ?

Carney was a mouth in the dressing room. Peacock lead by example, right in the trenches in the heat of battle, while biscuit legs carney limped off with another feeble hamstring tweak

Massive fan of Peacock. A true leader. However he's made himself look a bit daft with this.

Does he think props make better pundits?

'Baz' and 'Tez' are two of the worst.

Jon Wells is a qualified lawyer I believe, and although Carney can be a bit irritating at times he is at least articulate. I'm sorry JP great player that you were, you do come across as been ' a bit thick ' TBH

Can't really argue with any of that to be honest

Is this that peacock who's last punditry effort eulogised about how roby would play danny houghton off the park and be the difference between saints and Hull? His brain has melted in the rarified air of east hull

How long ago was that thread now?

In your opinion - the truth is you were using stats that you didn't fully understand and produced a string of both false and misleading outcomes.

If that is the best example of my being uncivil to you or anyone else on here I think I can live with it.

I recall Peacock slamming the GB backs when we got hammered in Brisbane, claiming the forwards had done their job and had been let down by the backs. If anything my recollection was only one GB forward (Morley) seemed to play at anything like the level of his opponents, and the GB forwards provided no link at all, leaving the halfbacks (who were dire) with the sole option of aimlessly passing the ball wide or dying with the ball.