Player: Metres - Carries (MT/Carry) - Tackles - Misses (Efficiency %) - Errors - Penalties Leeds: 1462 - 226 (6.47) - 272 - 28 (91%) - 11 - 8 Webb: 37 - 3 (12.33) - 0 - 0 (N/A) - 0 - 0 Jones-Bishop: 164 - 16 (10.25) - 8 - 1 (89%) - 0 - 0 Watkins: 62 - 10 (6.20) - 10 - 5 (67%) - 2 - 0 Senior: 82 - 15 (5.47) - 23 - 1 (96%) - 1 - 1 Hall: 137 - 16 (8.56) - 1 - 0 (100%) - 1 - 0 Sinfield: 83 - 20 (4.15) - 23 - 2 (92%) - 1 - 1 Burrow: 78 - 13 (6.00) - 8 - 1 (89%) - 0 - 0 Leuluai: 114 - 18 (6.33) - 17 - 4 (81%) - 1 - 0 Buderus: 100 - 22 (4.55) - 30 - 1 (97%) - 1 - 0 Burgess: 111 - 19 (5.84) - 22 - 1 (96%) - 0 - 1 Jones-Buchanan: 66 - 12 (5.50) - 27 - 2 (93%) - 1 - 2 Delaney: 99 - 11 (9.00) - 20 - 1 (95%) - 1 - 0 Ablett: 46 - 9 (5.11) - 19 - 1 (95%) - 1 - 1 Smith: 87 - 10 (8.70) - 9 - 2 (82%) - 0 - 1 Clarkson: 34 - 6 (5.67) - 13 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Hauraki: 69 - 14 (4.93) - 19 - 5 (79%) - 1 - 0 Kirke: 93 - 12 (7.75) - 23 - 1 (96%) - 0 - 1 Try Assists: Keith Senior (Brent Webb Try) Carl Ablett (Ryan Hall Try) Ben Jones-Bishop (Rob Burrow Try) Danny Buderus (Weller Hauraki Try) Arguably the finest piece of skill on the night (Kevin Sinfield to Ben Jones-Bishop) went unrewarded. Nothing also for the Chris Clarkson try. Previous Round/s: Bradford (N) SL16-01 viewtopic.php?f=17&t=482879

Player: Metres - Carries (MT/Carry) - Tackles - Misses (Efficiency %) - Errors - Penalties Leeds: 1462 - 226 (6.47) - 272 - 28 (91%) - 11 - 8 Webb: 37 - 3 (12.33) - 0 - 0 (N/A) - 0 - 0 Jones-Bishop: 164 - 16 (10.25) - 8 - 1 (89%) - 0 - 0 Watkins: 62 - 10 (6.20) - 10 - 5 (67%) - 2 - 0 Senior: 82 - 15 (5.47) - 23 - 1 (96%) - 1 - 1 Hall: 137 - 16 (8.56) - 1 - 0 (100%) - 1 - 0 Sinfield: 83 - 20 (4.15) - 23 - 2 (92%) - 1 - 1 Burrow: 78 - 13 (6.00) - 8 - 1 (89%) - 0 - 0 Leuluai: 114 - 18 (6.33) - 17 - 4 (81%) - 1 - 0 Buderus: 100 - 22 (4.55) - 30 - 1 (97%) - 1 - 0 Burgess: 111 - 19 (5.84) - 22 - 1 (96%) - 0 - 1 Jones-Buchanan: 66 - 12 (5.50) - 27 - 2 (93%) - 1 - 2 Delaney: 99 - 11 (9.00) - 20 - 1 (95%) - 1 - 0 Ablett: 46 - 9 (5.11) - 19 - 1 (95%) - 1 - 1 Smith: 87 - 10 (8.70) - 9 - 2 (82%) - 0 - 1 Clarkson: 34 - 6 (5.67) - 13 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Hauraki: 69 - 14 (4.93) - 19 - 5 (79%) - 1 - 0 Kirke: 93 - 12 (7.75) - 23 - 1 (96%) - 0 - 1 Try Assists: Keith Senior (Brent Webb Try) Carl Ablett (Ryan Hall Try) Ben Jones-Bishop (Rob Burrow Try) Danny Buderus (Weller Hauraki Try) Arguably the finest piece of skill on the night (Kevin Sinfield to Ben Jones-Bishop) went unrewarded. Nothing also for the Chris Clarkson try. Previous Round/s: Bradford (N) SL16-01 viewtopic.php?f=17&t=482879

Player: Metres - Carries (MT/Carry) - Tackles - Misses (Efficiency %) - Errors - Penalties

Hull FC: 1114 - 181 (6.15) - 337 - 25 (93%) - 18 - 5

Whiting: 109 - 10 (10.90) - 6 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0

Sharp: 95 - 16 (5.94) - 4 - 4 (50%) - 0 - 1
Manu: 53 - 10 (5.30) - 15 - 1 (94%) - 1 - 1
Yeaman: 53 - 10 (5.30) - 11 - 2 (85%) - 1 - 0
Briscoe: 180 - 10 (18.00) - 2 - 0 (100%) - 2 - 1

Turner: 30 - 9 (3.33) - 18 - 0 (100%) - 1 - 0
Long: 27 - 5 (5.40) - 9 - 0 (100%) - 3 - 0

O'Meley: 75 - 17 (4.41) - 30 - 3 (91%) - 1 - 2
Houghton: 86 - 11 (7.82) - 43 - 2 (96%) - 1 - 0
Radford: 69 - 11 (6.27) - 18 - 0 (100%) - 1 - 0
Westerman: 51 - 14 (3.64) - 31 - 2 (94%) - 1 - 0
Tickle: 46 - 10 (4.60) - 36 - 5 (88%) - 5 - 0
Fitzgibbon: 73 - 16 (4.56) - 59 - 3 (95%) - 0 - 0

*Obst: 42 - 9 (4.67) - 6 - ? (??%) - 0 - 0
Washbrook: 31 - 5 (6.20) - 29 - 2 (94%) - 0 - 0
Lauaki: 36 - 5 (7.20) - 6 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0
Moa: 58 - 13 (4.46) - 14 - 1 (93%) - 1 - 0

Try Assists:

Zip, Nothing, nada, Bugger All

Not even for Willie Manu who laid the final Hull try on a plate for Will Sharp.

*Opta were never any good at recognising when a player changes club in season. Nothing's changed in that regard and so Sam Obst's figures are the balance of the Hull weekly total minus all the other players. That is except for missed tackles which is impossible to calculate using that method from the website as it's basically s[ihi[/it.

Watkins needs to improve on his tackle effectiveness if those stats are right (as well as his ball security which you've picked up on elsewhere).

Hauraki`s missed/tackles efficiency needs to improve.
Is Fitzgibbons 59 tackles correct?
If so pretty impressive with a 95% rate to go with it.

I'm starting to wonder about the OPTA stats. They had the Bulls down for missing the fewest tackles of any SL club so far this season!

To be credited as a miss, you actually have to make the effort first. I think the Bulls stats are probably correct.

Genius!

Quote ="Bullseye"I'm starting to wonder about the OPTA stats. They had the Bulls down for missing the fewest tackles of any SL club so far this season!'" Depends which measure you use from the Opta website. If you use this one www.engagesuperleague.co.uk/stat ... 11&hp2=550 then obviously it is competely meaningless. Why it's meaningless I have no idea you'd have to ask Opta for an explanation but everyone can see it's meaningless and always has been as far as I recall. To get to the more comparable figure you have to add up all the individual missed tackled totals from all the Bradford (or any teams squad) and whose going to bother to do that? Alright then as it's you (a fellow Pudsey, ex-Pudsey lad(?)) and as it's only week 2 (so only a five minute job) ..... Bradford's combined miss tackle stat is =#FF000049. There you go that's 3 more than Leeds' so while I can't tell you where either of us are on the actual (plausable) missed tackle table I can at least reassure you that Bradford are above Leeds. Quote ="chapylad"Is Fitzgibbons 59 tackles correct? '" There as correct as Opta allow them to be correct. Week 1 V Hull KR - 47 tackles + 4 misses (92%) Week 2 V Leeds - 59 tackles + 3 misses (95%) He needs to work on his technique to get those percentages up.

Quote ="Bullseye"I'm starting to wonder about the OPTA stats. They had the Bulls down for missing the fewest tackles of any SL club so far this season!'" Depends which measure you use from the Opta website. If you use this one www.engagesuperleague.co.uk/stat ... 11&hp2=550 then obviously it is competely meaningless. Why it's meaningless I have no idea you'd have to ask Opta for an explanation but everyone can see it's meaningless and always has been as far as I recall. To get to the more comparable figure you have to add up all the individual missed tackled totals from all the Bradford (or any teams squad) and whose going to bother to do that? Alright then as it's you (a fellow Pudsey, ex-Pudsey lad(?)) and as it's only week 2 (so only a five minute job) ..... Bradford's combined miss tackle stat is =#FF000049. There you go that's 3 more than Leeds' so while I can't tell you where either of us are on the actual (plausable) missed tackle table I can at least reassure you that Bradford are above Leeds. Quote ="chapylad"Is Fitzgibbons 59 tackles correct? '" There as correct as Opta allow them to be correct. Week 1 V Hull KR - 47 tackles + 4 misses (92%) Week 2 V Leeds - 59 tackles + 3 misses (95%) He needs to work on his technique to get those percentages up.