Why was Briers not put on report for a dangerous tackle ? Oh I know , it was because he smiled at Bentham !

Why does Briers start limping and hiding when things start to go wrong ?

Why is Briers allowed to take goal line drop-outs up to two metres from the goal line ?

Why does Briers take it up....

...better not, don't want to upset his precious little sole xxxx

The RFL will still look at this tackle and decide if further action is needed. However a penalty was awarded to Huddersfield so I don’t see what’s wrong?

Seems to me that you’re nit picking on this one I’m afraid.



He’s played top flight rugby league for a long time and had a lot of injuries. There’s people in sport who’ve gone through games with broken bones and don’t show it if they winning. But when you’re losing you start to think about that injury more and it starts to show to the audience watching as well.



You’ll have to write to the RFL about that one!

And because it actually wasn't that dangerous!



so what if he does? he still managed to kick, run and pass.



a whole two metres? when he's kicking the ball a further 50 metres down field, does two metres mate that much difference? Really?

I have no issues with Buderus (and Briers) being penalised for lifting a player's legs above the horizontal as that is the interpretation the refereees are supposed to apply.

The difficulty in understanding comes only when O'Loughlin did it last night and no penalty was forthcoming and when Brough (was it?) did it on Atkins tonight, again with no penalty.

It will also be interesting to see if King's reaction to a harmless looking bodycheck from Griffin is viewed as proportional and whether Paul Wood charging in to the ensuing scrap from yards away throwing plenty of leather in to the bargain is worthy of action.

The games gone fooking soft.

Have a word with yourself!

Outstanding halfback in not totally dominating mode shock.