there hasn't been an outcry against Stanley Gene for his actions on Friday night?

[url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=1499He's off for tea and biscuits at Red Hall tomorow night though[/url

If it had been a Saints player all the "Judge Nutmeg's" on here would be after a [isine die [/iban.

Double standards

we like stanley



oh, and his book is a supurb read. a must for all RL fans

You posted Webb's report not Stanleys



But yeah you have a point, strange it hasn't been mentioned.

I've sorted that little problem out now

You dont mess with Stanley "Father Time" Gene.

Or else what you get a couple of fingers to the eye ?

Ban Gene!

Because we're not a bunch of over the top, newcomers, s[ihitb[/iag, over reactionary, air fairy clueless fans like the woolybacks?

You make a very valid point about how dignified and measured our response has been to an alleged gouging, not to mention the response of our players (did Webb refuse to shake hands?) in comparison to the wailing and screaming from redvee, the entertainers etc these last few weeks.

Obsessed you are G.

Killjoy.

You've beaten them too it.

PARANOID

Well got that song stuck in my head now haven't I?

Andoid?

Do you think I have a point?

Judge for yourself the way we have reacted to an alleged gouging of one of our players.

Now imagine the allegations were against Senior on Graham. Think what your board would be like.

Do I have a point?

Up to a ceratin point.

Gouging deserves to be dealt with in the strictest terms. A scumbag of an offense.

If it were Leeds/Saints players either board would be swamped because of the rather intense rivalry as of late.

So, he's right then?

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 270166.stm told you he wouldn't get banned.need to knife someone to get a ban in the play-offs or for a challange cup final.

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 270166.stm told you he wouldn't get banned.need to knife someone to get a ban in the play-offs or for a challange cup final.

Dont say that, if Leon Pryce reads this he'll be wondering out on to the field with a glass in one hand and chair leg in the other.

he may even wander onto the pitch instead of thinking about it

we aren't moaning little pussies that's why.

and to be frank i was more annoyed with webb lashing out which conceded the penalty.

if you're going to lash out do it when play has moved away and it's less likely to be spotted.

But then this is no suprise. Despite what some on here will try and drill into your brain a large majority of leeds fans aren't clueless idiots.

In stark contrast to that lot over't pennines.

He has a massive point.

It's not just the leeds saints thing, if any player had done that to ''jammer'' (why do you give your players such gay nicknames?) saints fans would have been calling for the death penalty.

As I pointed out on the VT, read the full report from the RFL disciplinary if you fancy a giggle.

Apparently one of the mitigating factors was that Brent Webb stood up, making it look worse than it was.

Possibly correct. I thought it was a reasonable verdict - there didn't look like that much contact. Certainly no worse than Gidley onn JJB a couple of weeks ago that was completely ignored.

I nearly just vommed big style there. Cheers for that.