Player: Metres - Carries (MT/Carry) - Tackles - Misses (Efficiency %) - Errors - Penalties

Leeds: 1248- 191 (6.53) - 260 - 39 (87%) - 16 - 7
Salford: 1083 - 157 (6.90) - 342 - ? (??%) - 11 - 13

Webb: 111 - 13 (8.54) - 10 - 3 (77%) - 3 - 0

Donald: 48 - 7 (6.86) - 4 - 3 (57%) - 2 - 0
Smith: 33 - 7 (4.71) - 14 - 5 (74%) - 1 - 0
Watkins: 83 - 10 (8.30) - 16 - 3 (84%) - 1 - 0
Hall: 87 - 12 (7.25) - 7 - 0 (100%) - 1 - 0

Ablett: 100 - 12 (8.33) - 23 - 3 (88%) - 3 - 2
Burrow: 33 - 10 (3.30) - 5 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 1

Leuluai: 85 - 14 (6.07) - 18 - 2 (90%) - 0 - 0
Diskin: 63 - 12 (5.25) - 26 - 2 (93%) - 2 - 1
Peacock: 151 - 23 (6.57) - 33 - 3 (92%) - 1 - 1
Kirke: 39 - 6 (6.50) - 14 - 2 (88%) - 0 - 0
Lauitiiti: 58 - 10 (5.80) - 21 - 3 (88%) - 1 - 1
Worrall: 94 - 15 (6.27) - 27 - 6 (82%) - 0 - 0

Jones-Bishop: 64 - 7 (9.14) - 0 - 0 (N/A) - 0 - 0
Pitts: 66 - 10 (6.60) - 16 - 0 (100%) - 1 - 1
Bailey: 76 - 14 (5.43) - 15 - 1 (94%) - 0 - 0
Burgess: 57 - 9 (6.33) - 11 - 3 (79%) - 0 - 0

Please note that Jay Pitts' stats represent the missing balance of the Leeds total as OPTA haven't updated his individual stats according to the SL website. Yet they appear to have made their way into the Leeds overall total,

you should be.

Try assists this week to Hall (Watkins try), Burrow (Webb try) and Webb (Pitts try). I'm past caring why Webb got one when Pitts had two men to get through on the line which is usually enough to rule an assist out..... most of the time.

Penalty count won yet again.

Top tackler - Jamie Peacock with 33.

I guess that's just about it for this season from me as I doubt the SL website will be updated during the play-offs.

Previous week's stats:

[url=http://posting.php?mode=quote&p=14530772:usuofuqxLeeds V St Helens[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=426809&highlight=:usuofuqxCeltic V Leeds[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=425614&highlight=:usuofuqxLeeds V Castleford[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=423042&highlight=:usuofuqxLeeds V Warrington[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=422004&highlight=:usuofuqxWigan V Leeds[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=420684&highlight=:usuofuqxLeeds V Hull KR[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=419641&highlight=:usuofuqxWakefield V Leeds[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=418838:usuofuqxHull V Leeds[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=417161&highlight=:usuofuqxLeeds V Bradford[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=416269&highlight=:usuofuqxHarlequins V Leeds[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=415140&highlight=:usuofuqxLeeds V Huddersfield[/url:usuofuqx
[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=414229&highlight=:usuofuqxLes Catalans V Leeds[/url

Great work from Ablett yet again.

A vote of thanks from us all tvoc.

Seconded!!
TVOC is the Jedi Master of Stats for ss.com!

4th in a row by my reckoning - no coincidence that as we get closer and closer to the business end all of a sudden we seem to be getting the basics right.....

Thanks Tvoc, a top job as allways.

Where as me and G1 like to watch girl on girl porn on the internet, and loz and jord like to watch boy on boy porn on the internet, I have found [url=http://reds.originalreddevils.com/infostats/leaguegeek/TVOC's porn page[/url on the internet!

Whatever floats his boat

Why dont we have one of those?

I'm jealous!

why would you want one? just type in girl on girl porn into google!

I've got enough of that at home rather than having to google it at work

Me too and it's not often you'll find anything associated with Salford to say that about.

A few weeks out of date though.

____________

Thanks for the thanks folks, CMR has offered to take over the service for next season.

Now that WILL be entertaining

Great to see that JJB didn't give away any penalties this week.
Seriously, the tackle misses figure is a worry.
We can't afford that for the next few weeks.
Pitts figures are impressive.

depends on what is classed as a missed tackle, and the outcome of the miss. if all these misses lead to breaks/big meters gained/quick play the balls/etc, then yes it is a problem.
however it wouldn't surprise me to see that half these missed tackles where actually whilst someone was running across the line, and that the miss was more a missed opportunity or someone laying a hand on the attacker but not finishing the tackle. thus the misses cause no harm to the defence, if anything can lead to the attacker losing ground

how is efficiency measured and why is Donalds so low?

Successful tackles divided by total amount of tackles attempted X 100.

In Donald's case: 4/7=0.57 X 100= 57%.

His are low because he attempted a total of 7 tackles and completed 4, which is just over 50%.

The tackle efficency is the percentage of successful tackles made when assessed against the total tackles attempted (ie tackles + missed tackles)

Therefore in Donald's case this week:

4 tackles + 3 missed tackles = 7 attempted tackles

4 tackles / 7 attempted tackles = 57%

Edit: Take your pick of the two explanations.

Ah right. He's a softcock. Got it.

Spin it whichever way you like, a missed tackle is an opportunity to put the ball carrier to ground and prevent them from scoring on that particular play.

There is no such thing as a good missed tackle.

Assuming these stats are accurate which the statistician who repeats them each week confirms they are not.

He get's a softcock near your wife.

This does not constitute a wife

While I openly doubt there verasity there is no question that Donald missed at least one tackle (possibly two) in the Stefan Latchford try.

Kylie misses a tackle in the receeding ptb to Salford's 1st try. JP bets brushed off for the try.

Are they softcocks?

Ablett misses Wilshire on his try, and misses one in the preceeding play.

Is he a softcock?