What are we going to do for a front row next weekend

Peacock On report / England
Leuleui On Report could be banned
Kirk Broken Leg
Bailey England call up due to Peacock and Sam Burgess both serving bans

Yes I know the last one is unlikely but stranger things have happened

So that leaves
Burgess
Worrell
Ambler

But the England match is really important, huh?

If Peacock gets banned he'll miss the england game, so could play for Leeds. Come on Red Hall. Ban the dirty fekka

Would that be allowed?

If Peacock gets banned he will miss Harlequins.

Whats that based on?

They wouldnt ban them from the England game, due to it just being a friendly, not a important match, but they will be banned from the next superleague game, if they are chosen to play for England that is.

Well you'd expect the England captain to get chosen to play wouldn't you?

If he gets banned he will miss the next game after the ban, ie England game against France. If he got two games he would miss the Hudds game.

How would he miss the Huddersfield game when the Huddersfield game is the same weekend as England game? i think you mean Harlequins.

Dont think it works like that

Quote ="Lawrie L"Dont think it works like that'" To say that no players will be doubling up. www.therhinos.co.uk/news/7381.php I agree with your statement, imo i think that he will (if in doubt) miss the harlequins game, and play this weekend.

Quote ="Lawrie L"Dont think it works like that'" To say that no players will be doubling up. www.therhinos.co.uk/news/7381.php I agree with your statement, imo i think that he will (if in doubt) miss the harlequins game, and play this weekend.

It's a test match lad.

I'm not sure. in general you are given a ban in matches, rather than weeks in RU. He can't be penilised and told to miss 2 matches just because they fall on the same weekend can he? Of course they could just say he got a 2 game ban, and let him play against Quins.

Or they could bottle it and not ban the England captain for an England game. Hmmm, I wonder which option they'd take

Intresting point

I would be under the impression he would miss the England game and then the following week, but im not sure how the RFL would take that. My gut impression if their was a ban it might just be a game

Irrespective of Peacock or Burgess getting banned Bailey won't get picked for England.

On the prop front, JJB and Lauitiiti may well have to play stints there. It's 2006 all over again

Was it really bad then? If players got bans for high tackles we wouldn't have a game to watch?

So would he be available for the game on the sunday then? If not, surely that is more than a 1 game ban.

Joel Clinton is meant to be available in the near future.

I don't think so.The ban carries for the week.
It was done to stop teams counting reserve team games that were played on the same weekend as a first team game counting towards the ban.

Aye. Saints tried it when Sonny Nickle was banned for breaking Mears' jaw.

No, he wnet on loan to an NL 1 side or something, and served his ban before the start of the season or something like that

Difficult to say, Ganson intimated it started on the players shoulder and slipped up.

Looked bad at full speed and I haven't seen any replays since. Kylie's looked OK, I don't think he will cop a ban.

Shock, Horror. Jamie Peacock and Sam Burgess have no case to answer and will be available for England next weekend.