Would rather take Jonny Lomax and give It a go than some of the NRL options. Still think he is a better half.

but always injured sadly

Lomax's injury record would be the only thing putting me off, I assume that's why he's not got a deal with saints as well.

I also agree he could be a damn good half, a victim of the fad were a lot of decent young halves got moved to Fb.

Lomax will be 27 by next year and has yet to put a season together at Half-back. Not to mention you just can't get him on the field. Sadly i think its gone from what he can be to what he could have been.

Surprised Dec Patton hasn't been mentioned yet. Probably on his way out of Wire.

I dont know what it is about him but nearly every time i have seen him he has been really really good. I think it just must be when i'm watching because he doesnt seem to get the plaudits he deserves. Brad Dwyer too, he always seems dangerous when i see him but can't even seem to guarantee himself a shirt.

By the time Lomax gets it together, he'll be slower than Danny McGuire without the passing ability.

Dec patton could be a very good shout and possibly the answer to our half back problem, he's should in quite a few big matches in his career he can possibly step up to be a top class half back in super league I remember him controlling and dictating game to win wire the league leaders last year and I'm sure he put in a decent effort in grand final last year and scored all of wires points ( all 6 of them) . And he's got time on his side so if we we're to go in for him he could be a very decent buy.

Maybe we can nick him to compensate for the one we lose to Warrington.

not like you to talk in riddles

I would have thought only a two year old would find that a riddle.

Cory Aston?

well treat me like a two year old then and indulge me, who's the name

living in suffolk and not getting to many games because of family illness I'm not in the know

Don't fret, you're not the only one.

Sutcliffe to wire gotcha ?

Why would I want to treaty you like a two year old? there was no riddle, which you stated. It was a simple statement in reply to post about Patten, and simply perhaps we could take him to compensate for one going to WIre.

so a the risk of going around in circles who is going to wire?? straight answer

I didn't actually say we would did I? I started the sentence with maybe

But I do think we will, but will remain quite in the hope Leeds get their @r5e in gear.

no you said " maybe we can nick him, TO COMPENSATE FOR THE ONE GOING TO WIRE" pretty straightforward statement

He's making it up. Don't worry about it

And yet again an example of somebody posting what they think they see, rather than what is in front of their eyes. Why not just quote me, instead of making up a line? there is no stops in the sentence, it is one statement, and does not say GOING at all. The maybe is clearly emphasised, and before the "losing".

don't want to get into a drawn out discussion just clarify which player do you think we lose to Warrington, thanks in anticipation

I already said I am not going to say, as I strongly hope Leeds get themselvs in gear, and why my original post did not say going as you said. I don't think they will get themselves in gear, but if you find a player as not gone to Warrington come end of year, you can have a go at me then about it. Which of course I won't give a toss as I will be happy the player is here, but still I can't see it.

Christ.

if I read it 50 times I still won't understand it