Don't talk stupid

Hmm...



1 match?

Crusaders?? Anything I havent said that isnt true?? Even Sinfield has just said they were out enthused

I see you Potter out thread didnt last long on the Stains board

Can't believe how bad we played, yet somehow we could/should have scored enough to have won

& Dragons did us a favour beating Saints

"Lawries" Barmy army leaving early and swearing at the Hull Kr fans............Classy

Couldn't pick out a best or a worst performer. Lots of people played mediocre to average, and quite a few played awfully.

Just because they were out enthused doesn't mean they weren't interested. Hull KR wanted it more though.

No composure tonight and an awful kicking game.
I thought the yougsters did well especially Ambler and of Course Peacock but i also thought Sinfield had his worst game ball in hand for a long long time.
Too many times we had players stood still or too flat waiting for someone else to do something and Rovers had us sussed.
On another note a couple more injuries picked up with Burrow and Smithy forced off but with Saints losing and if Wakey can sneak a win we are still in with a chance of the top3/4.

Let's start with Hall who bombed 2 tries.
Sinfield who's poor pass gifted the try to Fox just before half time & who's general game with forward passes & poor kicking is the next contender.
I could go on but like the boys I just haven't got the enthusiasm for it.

I'm looking forward to watching Pitts & Ambler be moulded into our starting props of the future. Both looked solid again.

Watkins would of scored those!

No, touchy gits!

Can't fault his effort as usual but gave away a dumb penalty in the 2nd minute that got them off the hook & threw 2 poor passes that cost us possesion early on near their line, all of which meant we had to do more defending that took all the juice out of us later in the game.
I agree re Sinfield, but players stood too flat is our style & leads to throwing so many dubious passes.

Thought that Smith was very poor before he went off. Looked very slow and un-interested, and way off most kicks. sinfield was completely un-recognisable, Hall was generally good, but you can't excuse two cast iron tries bombed

True re- Peacock but he does the hard yards another thing i forgot to add tonight was the fookin dissent creeping back in


As for "our style" we still normally have at least 1 or 2 options in motion though and i lost count tonight how many times Mcguire,Mcshane and Burrow made a run to have a go at the line and looked for runners only to see half the team stood looking at each other.
I do think our young uns don't deserve any stick because they gave their all imo especially Ambler!

I see yer point mate but Dobson was kicking on the 2nd,3rd and 4th most of the night and he exploited our line not been ready which also made Smithy look way off positioning wise.
I don't think Hall is fully fit but it doesn't excuse his chances bombed.

Ambler, apart from his knock on, was impressive. Long stints, a lot of hit ups and industrious in defence. Looks a very good prospect.

Watts looked good for KR.

Don't talk [is[/ih[iit[/i.

Bad day at the office that's all. Rovers were the better team and didnt allow us to play.

We're still missing 7/8 players and it's only July. We shouldnt be wrtten off and Rovers need not get carried away.

not getting carried away but we were missing a few ourselves to the point were we had to borrow 1 off the pies due to having no fit centres at all in the club

McShane at least managed to justify Leeds' decision to recruit a second 1st grade hooker to the squad for the 2009 season.

yes he did.

What was our completion rate, anyone know?

We had a pretty wide range in the car coming back, but no one thought above 50%

I don't like to criticise young players, but McShane was awful.