Because we're not a bunch of over the top, newcomers, s[ihitb[/iag, over reactionary, air fairy clueless fans like the woolybacks?

You make a very valid point about how dignified and measured our response has been to an alleged gouging, not to mention the response of our players (did Webb refuse to shake hands?) in comparison to the wailing and screaming from redvee, the entertainers etc these last few weeks.

Obsessed you are G.

Killjoy.

You've beaten them too it.

PARANOID

Well got that song stuck in my head now haven't I?

Andoid?

Do you think I have a point?

Judge for yourself the way we have reacted to an alleged gouging of one of our players.

Now imagine the allegations were against Senior on Graham. Think what your board would be like.

Do I have a point?

Up to a ceratin point.

Gouging deserves to be dealt with in the strictest terms. A scumbag of an offense.

If it were Leeds/Saints players either board would be swamped because of the rather intense rivalry as of late.

So, he's right then?

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 270166.stm told you he wouldn't get banned.need to knife someone to get a ban in the play-offs or for a challange cup final.

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 270166.stm told you he wouldn't get banned.need to knife someone to get a ban in the play-offs or for a challange cup final.

Dont say that, if Leon Pryce reads this he'll be wondering out on to the field with a glass in one hand and chair leg in the other.

he may even wander onto the pitch instead of thinking about it

we aren't moaning little pussies that's why.

and to be frank i was more annoyed with webb lashing out which conceded the penalty.

if you're going to lash out do it when play has moved away and it's less likely to be spotted.

But then this is no suprise. Despite what some on here will try and drill into your brain a large majority of leeds fans aren't clueless idiots.

In stark contrast to that lot over't pennines.

He has a massive point.

It's not just the leeds saints thing, if any player had done that to ''jammer'' (why do you give your players such gay nicknames?) saints fans would have been calling for the death penalty.

As I pointed out on the VT, read the full report from the RFL disciplinary if you fancy a giggle.

Apparently one of the mitigating factors was that Brent Webb stood up, making it look worse than it was.

Possibly correct. I thought it was a reasonable verdict - there didn't look like that much contact. Certainly no worse than Gidley onn JJB a couple of weeks ago that was completely ignored.

I nearly just vommed big style there. Cheers for that.

Right, so he's been a bad boy before for other stuff. But you've not done this before. Oh, and there is a chance this could be your last game for Hull KR at Craven Park this weekend? Give us an extra £200 and we won't ban you then?

Why have the judiciary taken this into consideration, are they saying if it had been Round 15 they'd have banned him?

Baffling, it really is. I wonder what the panel are thinking of at times.

How can we cause the least amount of inconvenience for the player and his club would appear to be the theme of this season.

I agree, Gene shouldn't have put his hand there but there was nothing in it, it's not like he tried to finger Webbs brain.

Had Webb not thrown a hissy we would have kept them tryless.

bbc site gives his age as 35 , and the rest surely

He was also put on report in the previous match at Wakey. That resulted in nothing. Perhaps those at Red Hall are scared of Stanley, perhaps he will bring his dad down to sort them out!!! Now that would be scary!

I take it Oldham Rhino and me are exempt from that comment????

They'll be ok as long as they aren't methodists.