Quote ="Gotcha"Completely ignoring the point that Leeds and Huddersfield are way behind those teams, who were the clubs who chose not to go without reserve sides, yet were above them previously.'"
Yes Leeds are way behind those teams, but their's numerous reasons why
- The team struggling to to step up now Sinfield and Peacock aren't leading them
- the captain and experienced HB has missed most of the season
- our new hooker being a really poor signing so far
- McDermott perhaps reaching his shelf life at the club
- going into games with anywhere between 6-10 starters missing
- the training ground being flooded
- experienced players not performing well
All these are way more significant.
Do you really think all these things would be overcome and we'd be up in the top 4 if we'd played 3/4 reserve games? With how many injuries we've had what exactly would the lineups for these reserve games look like and how would they have helped us up the SL table? Looking at the match lineups for the sides with reserve teams, what players involved have been instrumental in their sides SL position?
The reserve competition is designed to give fringe players and young players games when they can't get into the first team.....however our fringe and young players are getting into the first team ATM because of injuries. If we'd have joined the reserve competition we'd have said at the start of the year it was ideal for the likes of Lilley, Handley and Golding to get game time.....yet they're getting that and at SL level instead right now.