Six of those who played last night wouldn't have played.

Bush, Clarkson, Kirke, Amor, Ambler, Pitts. Bailey at a push although he was one of our best players last night. In fact no, i'd say Burgess.

However, Clarkson was covering for two injuries as both Delaney and his replacement Watkins got injured.



Tell you what, write to Eddie Hemmings, Stevo et al (seeing as it was them who said it) and ask them instead of repeating the same fookin question on here between yoursleves.

Shhhhhh. dont bother or talk to them ponner they are not part of the secret top 8 gang

You're correct mate we shouldn't even be talking to these kinda people when between us we support the best 2 teams in Yorkshire(Hull aint Yorkshire, never will be)




I can just about remember when we used to hang around outside the top 8. We were pants then too

Jeez is it that hard to read the replies to the thread where your question has already been answered?

How much do you charge for your stand-up routine?

Not really though, 4 wins out of 5 without him in the team isn't really "$%£%^^& as you put it

Although i suspect that list is misrepresentative (you've only had 4 out for a sustained period), when you're in form injuries don't make as big a difference. Leeds have started the season in poor form, WCC and injuries have compounded that.

I don't get why you feel the need to come on here and boast about how many injured, on a leeds forum in a thread started by a warrington fan.

This is about leeds, f*ck off.

You don't seriously believe that though do you?.....or do you?

You're going to look like a d*ck at the end of the season, really.

But now...things have changed! the power has shifted and you're going to let us know about it.

You're good now...but...wait a minute, what have you won recently?

Oh....yeah F*CK ALL!

Come on, its only been 48 years since they last won the title. They have a right to mix it with Leeds, Saints and Bradford. They have earned that right.

Correct when you include rather than exclude the Wigan game. Luke Ambler being the =#FF000027th player used so far.

When you look at the 2009 season (at this same stage after Rd 8 and the WCC fixture) Leeds had used 22.

And now for the interesting bit - the comparison with the other SL clubs in 2010:

Bradford - =#0000BF20
Castleford - =#FF000026
Les Catalans - =#FF000025
Crusaders - =#40000023
Harlequins - =#80000024
Huddersfield - =#80000022
Hull - =#80000023
Hull KR - =#80000022
Leeds - =#FF000027
Salford - =#80000022
St Helens - =#80000023
Wakefield - =#FF000025
Warrington - =#0000BF20
Wigan - =#80000022

thos is amazing. i can understand bulls fans saints fans, even wigan fans at a push having a gloat as they have actually won something, but shudds fans




top 8 club



pmsl

what a set of clowns, come back and have a pop when you actually turn up and play in a final, instead of having your s drop out, better still when you actually win something.

which will be a long time

the real reason your languishing in the lower half of the division is simply because of the amount of effort you put into the world cup which as fek'ed you up. the aussies murdered you more than anybody thought and the resulting injuries and lack of form stem from that game.

As much as I am enjoying the Rhinos' predicament this year, and I am sure you will allow that much, I am astounded at the current Huddersfield "new force in rugby league" view of things. Everyone who knows anything about the game knows that if the Leeds form picks up at the back end of the season they could win the thing from anywhere in the top 8. They have the stars and the class to do it (gags and chokes on his food for a moment). Huddersfield have one decent season and a promising start and suddenly they are the next big thing. Get over yourselves.

If the silverware gets anywhere close to the Galpharm, I'll concede it, but Huddersfield are just doing what other clubs do in cycles: get somewhere near the top 2. After all, someone has got to finish third. Except this year, Huddersfield could well end up outside the top four as Saints pick up in the warmer weather and Leeds discover their form. So a worse finish than last year and still Yorkshire's new cream? Give me a break.

Wonder what Mr Ponner's excuse will be for these clear stats?

As far as I cam remember only Sinfield was injured in the WCC

I was nearly right

I know, it's laughable.

And they'll look even bigger idiots by october.

so....basically, the teams that have used the least amount of players (pretty settled 17) aree the ones generally near the top. Hudds 22.

As soon as we get bodies back and get a settled team we'll move up the table.

By that time, pooner and his deluded band of fantasists will have long gone from here.

what about Bulls then

They're just sh*t.





(hope i don't tempt fate for the next game)

it wasn't so much the injuries sustained in that match, as the amount of effort and disappointment suffered by your team after the loss

Not really, we won the next game 62-4. Admittedly against a side suffering from injuries, but the disappointment was pretty much shaken off that night.

Thanks I really hope you are right if not it could be a long season!

Huddersfield fans are rarely heard under any circumstances.