Noone ever took you seriously. Then you posted this.



on McClennan










Why should anyone EVER listen to you? Why?

A decent clubman at best.







Gareth OWNED you in one post above. I see you've ignored it you complete FATHEAD.

So how many is it? I presume it's 20 or so after this series, and still only made an impact in a game and a half? Surely you understand the point I'm making anyway. His International career surely precludes him from being a 'great of the game'. Leeds great, definitely but, even as a Leeds fan you wouldn't put him in the same bracket as the true greats of the game such as Wally Lewis etc. would you?

I'm not doubting he's a Leeds great. Just as there are club greats at every club (Cunningham at Saints being a prime example) who wouldn't neccessarily qualify as 'greats of the game'.

I don't think it's a question of 'could' - more a definite 'will'! And with Pryce as SO it's even more of an issue. When he decides to play, Pryce is very similar in style to Eastmond (and Eastmond has acknowledged this publically, hoping it would not spoil his chances). To have two Pryces, even when one does actually turn up at each match (as Eastmond does), could be a bit of a 'mare really. But as has already been said, Longy was a broken field runner type player when he first came to us so hopefully inside Eastmond there is also an organiser. If not, he may have to swap roles or we may have to look to someone else to take on the organising role (which we will have to in the interim anyway). Scrum halves don't automatically have to be the organisers but obviously it would be easier that way.

What with Potter's apparent ability to stifle our attack, next season could turn out to be quite an interesting one!

Eastmond is absolutely nothing like Pryce IMO.

He's a 7 who has shown a good passing and kicking game at academy level.

He said it, not me. I can see his point in that he is a runner not an organiser (as yet?). But I clearly remember the interview in the RL press when he self-identified as playing very like Pryce.


He was also a good centre in the Grand Final.

I deleted that post because 5 seconds after I wrote it I realised that engageing an idiot in conversation, no matter how obvious a total fekkwitt he is, does in some way give him credibility.

So I'm not talking to Phuzzy now (that would be like trying to communicate with an amoeba by banging two hamsters together), I'm merely explaining with a point of reference.

Sinfield voted best 13 in the world 2009! its humble pie time idiots!!

He's doing very well. Pleased to be eating my hat or whatever. It's much nicer to be proved wrong on the upside than the downside.



One thing I would say is that the halfbacks of Eastmond/Tomkins is probably the best combination to use alongside Sinfield as neither of them are going to be leading the side around as yet. If we had quality experienced halfbacks I doubt there would be the same role available - in fact there really shouldn't be. In that case I'd see Sinfield as potentially our best hooking option.

For Leeds it'll be interesting to see how things develop from here. If I were McGuire I'd be wanting - actually needing - to develop a more rounded stand-offs game that won't fold under pressure. Which in turn means taking more responsibility for the team as a whole.

tell me, what would he HAVE to do in your eyes to become a great of the game?

Be a 4 time championship winning captain??
Or a 3-in-a-row winning captain??
Harry sunderland and lance todd winning captain???
M.O.M in a winning team against the WC holders??
Short-listed for the golden boot??
Voted the best 13 in the WORLD??
I guess he's a long way to go G before he "proves" himself a great of the game to RL genius phuzzy!!!

Yes this thread is still going and how you must want it to stop as your public lack of judgement comes back to bite you

Sinfield with his consistent performances on the field has proved you totally wrong. He was selected by Smith as first choice 13 and only moved at halftime to 9 because of the failure of other players to be effective in the distribution roles. He was selected as MOM having played half the NZ game at 13 and half at 9. He has been shortlisted for the coverted Golden Boot award based on his performances at 13 and his leadership and he has now been selected at 13 in the International Federation "Team of the Year" as one of only 3 British players (and only 2 SL players) He is the hub of the Leeds team and now he is the hub of the England team.

PS

Someone who has to boast is trying to cover over their inadequacies

Seems to tick a lot of boxes doesn't he?

Not forgetting his career still has some time to run.

Why do you we have this attitude to our players in Rugby league? Like I said, if he were a Union player he'd be adored and, most probably knighted.

With the exception of a World Cup win, he's achieved as much if not more in his career both domestically and internationally than Jonny Wilkinson.

Fair do's. It becomes a matter of opinion as to what constitutes "greatness" doesn't it? For me there are certainly no British players of this era who qualify on the international stage. With opinions there is always room for disagreement though.

IMO if players like Andy Farrell, Peacock, Fielden a few years ago & Senior had played in the Australian team they may have looked just as "great" as the great Aussies.

Would the right result on Saturday change your opinion?

It would certainly go a fair way. I don't think any of this generation of players have been part of a team that has really "delivered" on the international stage. It's harsh tarnishing individuals with the team's brush, but it's only my opinion. It's the same reason I refuse to acknowledge Ryan Giggs or George Best, for example, as football greats.

In which case do you consider Ellery Hanley to be one of the greats?

Why does being part of a 4 nations winning team mean so much more than being part of a team that won a series against the Kiwis in 2007?

Hanley is a tricky call. I'd argue that he did more at international level than Sinfield has done yet, but he didn't win a right lot at that level either. The door's very much open for Sinfield to surpass Hanley I would have said.

Without wanting to go into too much more debate over the much-discussed 2007 tour, it would be fair to say that I wasn't, personally, too impressed with the quality of the Kiwi side. I'd really want to see an Ashes win or a win in the big tournaments that have replaced the Ashes. There's no formula for greatness, it's always going to be subjective. I want Sinfield to do more at international level than he has yet done before I'd call him that. If he's consistently outstanding in those Tests over a few years and helps at least make England more competitive I am more than prepared to reconsider.

The alcoholic waster I give you, but Giggs? Are you out of your mind? What that man has achieved is enormous. He had three kids ten years younger than him in his pocket the other day against Chelsea.

Well in short I suppose the difference between a 'club great' and a 'great of the game' would be what he does on the world stage. I personally don't think a good game and a half at International level from a 12 year career qualifies. Obviously you do. That said, if he continues to put in the sort of performances he has in the last game and a half over a sustained period, then certainly he could lay claim.

Here's a simple test for you. Ask anyone who watches RL, on any continent, whether they regard, say, Wally Lewis as a RL great. I'm sure you already know the answer (and indeed would give the same answer yourself). Now do the same for Sinfield away from this board. Do you really think you would get a resounding 'Yes' from someone in Australia, NZ, PNG, France etc. Hell, you wouldn't even get a resounding 'Yes' from the majority of English fans! It takes more than a few Leeds fans hailing him as a 'great of the game' to make it so. It would need to be pretty much universally acknowledged. I'm certainly not saying he won't get there, just that it's way too early given what he's done at International level to date. Don't forget that it's only a year ago that he, himself, thought that his International career was over after a terrible WC. Do you honestly believe that is the stuff of 'world greats'?

Playing for football Manchester United is enough for me to not aknowledge them at all. Unfair?
But there are lines to be drawn and that's one of them.
My son is a closet Man Utd fan (I can tell by which Match Attax are in his favourites pile), he has no idea that if he doesn't sort himself out soon he'll be living in a cardboard box and eating out of the bins. No son of mine...etc...etc...

Aw diddums! Does the big, nasty man not agree with you?

This is where the argument falls on it's IMO, Ramrod gave you Gazza as his prime example earlier, its all about personal opinion.