Fair enough. Looked a tad late but maybe not malicious.
Unlike Hardaker who tried to remove Hills eye ball and whispering homophobic words into his ear at the same time.
Apparently Hardaker is the worse thing ever to grace a rugby pitch.

Picture in the YEP today of when Briscoe scores and Sutcliffe hugs him and Hardaker jumps on Sutcliffe's back and his finger looks to be right in Sutcliffe's eye......so he even attacks his own guys lol

I blame Sinfield's thug like influence

You've lead a one man campaign to try and get Zak banned, but it hasn't worked.

You mischievous k unt.

Haha. One man campaign? Nonsense. I didn't particularly want him to get banned. I gave my opinion that I think he should, but that doesn't mean I strongly felt that I wanted him too.

I gave an opinion, the RFL don't agree, I've moved on. You probably should too.

You posted this thread/one similiar on numerous other boardsand generally seemed to be eager to drum up alot of discussion and attention to the incident. You knew what you were doing. I wouldn't be at all suprised if it was you, under another alias that drew attention and started the homophobic campaign.

Now you really are being ridiculous. I have no alias on here. I gave my opinion at the time using this username.

Yes I wanted to start discussion on the incident, because I hadn't seen it being discussed anywhere else. Surely the whole point in these forums is to discuss these kind of things?

If it was a role reversal and a Warrington player had done it to Sinfield for example, would you be so against it being discussed as you are now? I very much doubt it.

It's such a sad state of affairs when somebody can't have an opinion that differs from the majority without being subjected to abuse.

You're such a xenophobic lot. Very, very sad.

Warrington forum - Hey guys, look at what zak did, big ban don't you think?

Saints forum - Hey guys, look at what zak did, big ban don't you think?

Wigan forum - Hey guys, look at what zak did, big ban don't you think?

Leeds forum - Hey guys, look at what zak did, big ban don't you think?

If a warrington player did it to sinfield, i'd discuss it in the relevant thread or start a thread on the leeds board if one hadn't been done already. I wouldn't run around, starting threads on just about every main rivals forum, complete with selective photo evidence and loaded question.

It's blatantly obvious to anyone what you were up to.

I started one on the Leeds and Warrington boards as they were the two teams involved. I started one on the Saints board as I am a Saints fan. I didn't mention anything on the Wigan board.

So my crime is starting numerous threads, as opposed to simply thinking he should have been banned?

Even some of the saints fans were slightly bemused as to why it was on their board.

One fan. The same fan who has had some mysterious problem with me for quite some time. Nobody else questioned it. Until you of course.

Come on no one buys your "just wondering people's thoughts" excuse.

Had you genuinely been interested in the incident as a neutral no-motive fan you'd have viewed the incident in video, but it took me to point you towards the BBC iPlayer of the match. You started the threads based on a still photo before you'd watch the replay of the incident.....quite clear your intentions no matter how much you cry innocence.

Mr Giraffe .. You seen it yet ?

It's not only rlfans that this is going on

I don't think the fact that I based my initial opinion on a still photo says anything about my intentions. It probably says I jumped the gun a bit and was a bit lazy. However having seen the video my opinion didn't change.

Your assumptions about me and my intentions do not bother me in the slightest. I don't need anyone to "buy" my "excuse." I attempted to start up a debate on the incident and I gave my opinion on it. It really is as simple as that.

As I said the other day, I have no interest in sitting through the Cas v Widnes game again in order to spot the tackle you are referring to. However if you are that interested in my opinion on an incident in that game then kindly tell me when it happened and I will go and find it on the iplayer.

You were doing quite well on here with some shakey evidence and a very veiled undertone.

But, the lads been cleared and you have been found out.

All good things....

Good.

Thread.

This.

Oh.

Cake?

Haha. How have I been found out? The RFL simply don't share the same opinion as me. So what? Life would be very boring if we all agreed on every incident.

I don't see the big deal personally. I have never known a group of people be so hostile towards somebody simply because he disagrees with most of you on something. Very, very odd.

I thought you'd moved on?

Have you brought me any cake yet? Chop chop.

If people keep throwing insults and accusations at me then I will continue to defend myself.

With regards to the cake, I genuinely have no idea what you're talking about.

If the last 3 pages are an example of the OP moving on I dread to think what it would be like if he hadn't.

Haha. I have moved on in as much as I am not discussing the incident itself any further and I haven't carried on this supposed "campaign." Nor I haven't criticised the RFL's decision.

However, as I have just said a little bit earlier, if people are going to carry on accusing me of all sorts of rubbish then I am going to defend myself. When people stop doing that, I'll stop posting.

The thread being locked would probably be for the best in all fairness.

Don't play ignorant with me, young man. Do you have cake or not? It's a perfectly simple question.