Even when we were at are prime Ganson would do his best to screw us. See the 25-25 draw with Widnes

To summarise:

SL Regular Rounds: With Ganson (98 to date)

Bradford Played 42, Won 25, Drawn 2, Lost 15, 62%

SL Regular Rounds: Without Ganson (96 to 200icon_cool.gif

Bradford Played 305, Won 221, Drawn 8, Lost 76, 74%

Not an exact like for like timescale but there's a limit to how much time I'm prepared to give to this.

So without Ganson in charge we have a 12% better chance of a win

Most of which you won......

Basically, yes it appears so.

Listen to the voices they can't all be wrong.

I say we get him on Trisha and let the interrogaters see if he is

a) a cheat
b) hates the Bulls
c) knew that Tansey was offside and in front and just thought I'll rob the Bulls
d) all of the above

Since we're being a bit geeky, those timescales are in fact probably (I couldn't say definitely as I don't have the stat-age) going to distort the final outcome significantly. 2 obvious reasons for this spring tro mind:

1) The period from 96-98, included in the "without" stats but not the "with" numbers, were probably, I reckon, a period of greater success for the Bulls than the last 2/3 years, which will mean they are likely to bost that win percentage a bit.

2) Particularly in the last few years, Mr Ganson has been likely to be in charge of big games, which will tend to be against the top teams, in other words, teams to whom Bradford are more likely to lose.

Just a thought.

That would be ace.

e) knew that Poching was shoved at the play the ball in the 2003 FE but gave a scrum head and feed to Wigan to rob Leeds of another GF appearance

So what are you saying ????

He would get found out so he never would go on the show.

We could have a Cheats special, get Cummings and that slime ball Russell Smith back for it.

Accepted but like I said there's a limit to the amount of time I'm giving to this one bearing in mind the desired outcome is primarily to fuel Mick's psychosis.

That despite your ramblings there really is no useful evidence to support your paranoia.

CARDIFF 2007

Anecdotal. Not interested.

Nothing to do with Ganson, just them being a crap team

You conceded 25 points to draw with widnes

You can't blame the referee for that

He robbed us. Gave Widnes a try in the last minute which was miles forward

Mick in all honesty mate "who gives a f#*k" if ganson screw's you lot?????

How on earth did you allow Widnes to be that close in the first place. If you allow them to be that close, you deserve to lose never mind draw.

Yeah how embarrassing would that be losing to Widnes in SL?

29-Apr-02 ….. SL 7-08 ….. Leeds 10 ….. Widnes 14 ….. Ian Smith
28-Jun-03 ….. SL 8-16 ….. Widnes 29 ….. Leeds 14 ….. Colin Morris

Still at least it wasn't Steve Ganson's fault.

Leeds lost at HOME to Widnes

Ganson got them close that is what happend.

I WAS AT THAT MATCH

That's when Widnes were good though Mick, finishing 7th and 9th in 2002 and 2003 unlike when they beat and then drew with Bradford in 2005

20-Feb-05..... SL 10-02 ..... Widnes 31 Bradford 22 ..... Ian Smith

and just to emphasize how poor they were in that last relegation season for them they also lost

07-Aug-05..... SL 10-23 ..... Bradford 74 Widnes 24 ..... Glen Black

Leeds allowed them to be close and deserved to lose. IIRC the second game was a live sky game and Leeds were awful that night and deserved to lose.