This year I have been a bit un-nerved by the inability to score within the opposition 20m zone. I have always felt much more comfortable when we are attacking from further out. Also having the best back line in the league is nothing unless we give them ball to work from, which has been few and far between. For me a lot of this comes down to the slow and often poor distribution from acting half, slowing up the speed of the ball down the line. Hooker has to be a priority, along with a strong running forward of the right age.

I am talking about the future,And before people think it's a anti sinfield rant it's not.kev has been proved to be one of our best players.suttcliffe and ward our the future of our team and we need to start phasing in/out next season or would you have them on the bench until kev is 35 and hope they are happy to have limited game time.
The way we are trying to fit all three playing without rotation is ridiculous and imo damage their legacy

McD didn't seem to have a problem moving Webb on. I think this idea that he won't drop/move established stars seems a bit of a misnomer.

Really?
Did you happen to catch any games this season .

Nope I do think Sutcliffe should get some game time there against the correct opposition next year but you were on about retiring Sinfield to a coaching role.
As far the 'trio' goes, I said earlier this season that what we've learnt from this year is that one needs to go. As Sinfield IMO is no longer suitable for Loose and neither he or Burrow are long term the answer at hooker. That leaves all 3 best suited to being in the halves (even Sinfield when he's had a proper hooker in the side) and 3 into 2 doesn't go. I along with most others think McGuire is the one that should probably make way.

Fair enough
I think we want the same thing which is a strong team with a good future .
It was not my intention to retire kev just yet but the clock ticks one way and I do not think playing people out of position regardless of past glories is good for the team