Oh dear....it looks like our neighbours are not getting into the spirit of things.......
Quote ="Adeybull"Total shìte IMO. Distorts the competition. I have never agreed with these extra games - however they are structured -and I do not now. We will have a whole new team and the first match is contrived against a team viewed pretty generally as much stronger than ours. These contrived ties are not fair, and should not count for SL points IMO.
If its "local derbies", why is it not Wire/Crusaders? And Salford/Hudds? Orf Wire/Salford? Maybe because they thought the games would be too uneven?
Would I say the same if roles were reversed? Probably not - I'd take any opportunity for points that presented itself. Being entirely partisan here.
I suppose if we managed to win I'd be one of the first trumpeting "the Bulls are back"...so I'm happy to admit total partisan hypocrisy up front before the Substandard trolls point it out.'"
"its not fair!"
what an enormous bag of wind!!!
and if you think thats bad, check out the footstamping on the Matt Orford topics!
and this from the toerag who hoped Mags would be out injured for 10 months....
Quote ="Ewwenorfolk"Sent an e-mail to the RFL asking why it is fair to give Bradford a harder start than any other SL club. We play a side who finished 6 places above us, whilst the rest are 1 or 2 space gaps, with 1 four space gap.'"
It's good to be a Rhino