could miss the semi being charged Grade B dangerous throw. could be a huge loss disappointed to say the least..... www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/30 ... er-charged

could miss the semi being charged Grade B dangerous throw. could be a huge loss disappointed to say the least..... www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/30 ... er-charged

Quote ="tigerman1231"could miss the semi being charged Grade B dangerous throw. could be a huge loss disappointed to say the least..... www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/30 ... er-charged'" That's all we need.

Quote ="tigerman1231"could miss the semi being charged Grade B dangerous throw. could be a huge loss disappointed to say the least..... www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/30 ... er-charged'" That's all we need.

Had a feeling he would be pulled for it given his previous....had it been Dixon for example he would have got a warning.

The thing is he had no need to do it...the game was won.

Get ready for a Tuesday double whammy....Carney will get 2 games and Weller's appeal will fail.

Widnes will be rubbing their hands over this....

I know Carney will be a loss to us but remember we beat Wigan without him , James Clare will do the job for us

Delboy66

Millington is the biggest blow...probably the most consistent forward for us this year.

Carney is the 3rd bit of bad news we have had over the week...well they say it goes in three's.

Still have confidence we'll win, just gives somebody else a chance to play. At the end of the day, Daryl will have them firing. Can't wait for the match!

Duke St, having previous has nothing to do with it, it is either guilty or not guilty. Even if Dixon had done it if deemed guilty he would be looked at. It only comes into play if after tried. If your guilty a previous offender would get more than one who has a good record. It's like pulling someone in for spitting in the street because he has a record for assault or malicious wounding or not pulling someone in for mugging an old lady because he has no 'previous'. You cannot say 'Well it does not really warrant a citing or suspension, but he has previous so we will bring him in, or alternatively 'It was bad enough to warrant action being taken, but he has had no previous, so we'll leave it alone. If it is deemed bad or illegal, you get charged whether you have previous or not and then it comes into play, and someone who has previous gets looked at less favourably. If the tackle is not worthy of even a citing or not illegal, you can have 'previous' as long as your arm, it should not make any difference.

The tackle to me appears to be no different to the one Paul Aiton made against Salford, which also resulted in just a penalty being given. (not saying for definite that it is). If this is the case, the fact is that Aiton's was not deemed bad, illegal or serious enough for a citing or further action, and so on that basis neither should Carney's, irregardless whether he has previous or not.

Like you say that will be our third big of bad news, and lets hope that's it, and we get a big slice of good news on Sunday tea time.

Hep Cahill...
Player does make late contact with opponent using illegal Shoulder Charge technique. Penalty sufficient.

Step forward James Clare...do us proud (again)!

So - we are are playing tiddlywinks after all.

Sunday let's get 'Tiddly' and laugh at The RFL 'Winkers'.

The disciplinary panel should be applauded. They got these correct.

Hauraki though should be lucky they didn't increase his ban for a frivolous appeal.

Strength in squad... You guys have it. I'm backing you lot to go all the way. Do the underdog and Yorkshire proud. Question is IF you win would he make the team for the final after missing out on Wigan and Widnes?

We might as well not bother playing rugby and have a tickling competition because it's about all you can do now. The RFL have no consistency with their decisions and are a laughing stock. I don't mind our players being banned, so long as the same rules apply to all clubs. Maybe Carney should change his surname to Peacock or Sinfield?

Did Peacock cause a player to be stretchered off.. NO
Did Sinfield throw a player dangerously..... NO

Does Weller have an early guilty plea....... NO
Does Carney have an early guilty plea......NO

SO why bring them up. Just admit it they deserve a ban.... again

Oh hear goes.
Let's bring the Leeds players into the argument.
Remind me how many times have Sinfield and Peacock been sent off in their career?
How many times has Carney been sent off?
I might be wrong but didn't Sinfield get a two match ban ?
Now if you want to look at players who have got away with things you could have brought in Pettybourne, Bowen, Welham and I'm sure many others.
As good a player as Carney is he is a loose cannon and one day will cost you big time.
You used to have the same with McGoldrick who you could always rely on him giving away a cheap penalty.
Powell must be well pleased with Carney.
You have a cracking team and are a joy to watch.
You just need to make sure Carney gets his head sorted.

It's a nightmare scenario if you're hanging round this board on Monday

Sinfield: 1
Peacock: 0



0

I'm not sure what that tells us. Ultimately though, it's Carney's bad disciplinary record that's cost him here.

I don't get the comparisons with Sinfield at all. We all know Carney has previous with the disciplinary panel. It's time we (Cas Tigers) sorted his problems out. We cannot afford to have him sat in the stands for a third of the season every year.

Yes spot in. Such a good player needs to be on the park not sat in the stand.
Clearly has some problems and if he can sort that out he will win you more games than lose em.
As I said you are a pleasure to watch and are well coached.
You could still win the league but you need the likes of Carney playing every week.
Correction on what I said before.
Should have said how many times has Carney been up in front of the disciplinary panel?

I think it's five times in total over the course of 18 months. Not good at all.

Hadn't realised it was that many times.

Carney is so strong and aggressive he can throw opposing wingers around like a rag doll.