[url=http://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/wolves/wolvesnews/5008544.BREAKING_NEWS__Morley_and_Carvell_to_face_disciplinary_chiefs/?ref=rssWarrington Guardian[/url.



Shame Thaler failed to do anything about either incident. Maybe there should be a referee's competence panel too.

Aye. Gaz told us

Did he? Sorry I don't get out much.

McGoldrick not been cited(only a caution

) for lashing out at king? Strange! Re Carvell and Morley,no case to answer x2.

Are they sure they watched the tape of the same match. I really like Warringtons fans, but dislike the team due to their dirty play.

[urlhttp://viewtopic.php?f=16&t=443835&start=87[/url





We can continue the 'they should've been sent off' discussion here though...

McGoldricks was handbags

So were the other 2. This isn't tiddlywinks you know.

So you'd be quite happy if ryan mcgoldrick led with the elbow into lets say morleys jaw then 50 mins later he swings his forearm into briers head after the ball had gone.







yeah right.

a swinging arm into an opponents head when he hasnt got the ball isnt handbags, it is a contact sport but that was a bad un.

What game were you watching ?

Morley has always been known for the cheap shot.

If there was a referees competence panel then Thaler would be out on his ear.

in McGoldrick's defence it looked to me like side-show-bob was having a good old grab of his borbles, hence the reaction from McGoldrick. McGoldrick must be one of the easiest players to wind up in SL so i'd say Matt King knew what he was doing!

Actually that's what I thought when I watched it too, although the camera angle was inconclusive.

=#8040FFI thought the same too watching on TV and seeing it again twice since.

carvel 1 match
morley zero match

No link as yet

Here you go:

[urlhttp://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=rleague/10/02/16/RUGBYL_Warrington.html[/url

Scandalous decision. He should have walked AND got 3 matches for that.

Seeing as neither TJ or the ref saw the Morley incident, he couldn't be dismissed.

However, I still believe it was a deliberate and cynical attack on Sherwin. It was easier for Morley to miss him than to hit him, if you watch the incident, he only starts to raise his arm once Sherwin releases the ball.

[url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php?player=morley&club=Warrington&from_day=&from_month=&from_year=&to_day=&to_month=&to_year=&league=&charged=&search=searchMorley's record[/url

So it seems like the discplinary board is equally as weak as Thaler was at reffing the game on Saturday. Not a great precedence for the season ahead.

If somebody was paranoid you might think somebody who had been "cited" 16 times with 13 no charges, 1 not guilty and 2 not serious enough for a suspension might actually have an argument for being unfairly targeted by match officials.

=#8040FFOr the RFL don't have the balls to ban a "big name" player.

You keep telling yourself that.

I said at the time that there was nothing in the Morley incident, a split second late but Sherwin was going down and at a wierd angle.

As for Carvell, think he's fortunate to get 1 match.

Really



I will be amazed if anyone but a Wire fan could share your view.

Disgraceful challenge that should have been dealt with at the time and the fact he has still got away with it beggars belief.

Although this is the RFL

I personally think there was a total over-reaction to the challenge, especially when looked at from all angles. If he'd have got banned for it, the RFL would have to ban anybody that touched another player a split second late.

The fact that Carvell got a ban shows that the ref bottled it-had he made the decision hed should have, there's no doubt we would have won, Briers or no Briers!
Bad on you Ben Thaler or as some prefer to call him Ben Failure!