I see Grady has been charged for the trip in the fev game it says 1-2 games so looks like he could miss the bash

when is this held as I thought was a Tuesday Details of Charge / Reason for NF : Rule – 15.1(a) Detail – Strikes – Tripping – Reaction Trip Grade – B Decision: Charge Incident: Tripping in the 55th minute (Taulapapa) - See more at: www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/dis ... #advSearch

when is this held as I thought was a Tuesday Details of Charge / Reason for NF : Rule – 15.1(a) Detail – Strikes – Tripping – Reaction Trip Grade – B Decision: Charge Incident: Tripping in the 55th minute (Taulapapa) - See more at: www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/dis ... #advSearch

It should have been heard on 18/5 according to this:

"In relation to each round of Championship, League 1, iProSport Cup or Challenge Cup matches solely involving Championship or League 1 teams, or Academy matches, the Panel meet on the Thursday following the Round in question and consider any incidents that have been reported by Match Officials or otherwise brought to the attention of the Panel."

Also, EGP was available so I would have expected him to use it for the Rochdale match had he been guilty.

Read it somewhere that Grady has submitted an EGP, subsequently handed a one match ban. I assume that will be this coming weekend.

They do take an age to hear the Championship charges, in relation to Super League hearings.

gives somebody else a chance to come in and do us proud. UTFAX!!

FM,

What this boils down to is if the game includes an SL side it is done that week, otherwise if it is a game that only includes Championship and/or League 1 sides it is done the following week.

In theory this is due to the fact that the non SL sides could be part-time and the player may need to get time off work to attend the hearing.

It says: "Challenge Cup matches solely involving Championship or League 1 teams, or Academy matches, the Panel meet on the Thursday following the Round in question".

IE. 18/5

FM,

Now I understand, you are quoting from the disciplinary summary, whereas I was referring to section D2:25 of the operational rules (regularity of hearings) where it states that SL players are dealt with on the first Tuesday after the game in question and anyone else is dealt with on the second Tuesday after the game in question.

I believe it is the operational rules that take precedence here, but good to see the the RFL have contradictory information on their web site.

Good luck on Sunday, I'm hoping for a Fax win.