were we naive to go for goal and risk it hitting post/not going dead ?
IMO should have booted it into carpark.

The hooter had gone. (I believe)

Doesn't matter if the hooter had gone. If it had hit the post its play on, they score they win. I think we should have just booted it straight dead.

I could be wrong but I think we had indicated to kick for goal, and ref had signalled our intentions before hooter went, so not sure if we are allowed to change our minds after referee has signalled kick for goal. Would of been interesting to see Tyrer just launch his attempt straight into touch instead of towards goal, just to ensure we didn't hit the post.

I honestly didn't know that.
Think i will take up refereeing

TBH dont think we'd have scored if we were still playing now.
Faxs second half defence was awesome, completely snuffed us out
First half, well I'd hope you agree we should have scored a couple we had at least4/5 good chances but just couldnt get over the whitewash.
Real gutsy display from both teams and defence was on top
Good luck next week.

That's how i saw it and no need to change our minds just welly it dead.

Aye we said the same. Stranger things have happened, especially with Fax! The Dispensary, Liverpool. Fernandes Nelson IPA 5.1 % Mmm!

Thank's Batlad good old fashioned slogging in mud RL,credit to both sides,who
both seemed to play better up the slope.

You're right - it would.

It'd've been a penalty to Batley.

Aye, at half time we weren't happy with a four point lead going up 'hill but what an effort to nil Batley 2nd half. North Bar Leeds. Rooster's Londonium 5.5% Mmm!