I already have one, ta.



Is the chemist shut, Stan?

I heard a commentator on TalkSport this morning mention the "four corners of the Globe" and instantly thought about you, Stan.

It must be true then...Baaaaah

Well you can't be very efficient at it, all you do is stalk me with angst cranial insults. Firearms officer yeah right my bullet you are.

You can believe whatever you want, Stan. You plainly do with everything else.

That youtube clip is utter nonsense. You do realise that any scientific theory that has been changed due to new evidence has never been done so by some sad virgin sitting in his basement posting tripe on youtube.

Best thing about that video is Rowdy Roddy Piper around 4 and half minutes! Oh, and Henning Wehn doing the voice over.

Dear Mr Stanley, or can I call you Flat?
I'm confused.
On Wednesday morning I'm going to Central Sulawesi to witness the 'total solar eclipse'. [urlhttp://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/in/indonesia/palu[/url I've heard some stories about this phenomenon and how they know exactly where and when they are visible but these seem to rely on calculations based on the false science and their model of the 'solar system'.
I'd like to know how it really works. How can millions of people see it exactly as predicted. Where I live in South Sulawesi they say there will be only 90% coverage. Which is why I'm driving 14 hours to a suitable viewing position.
I guess it's something to do with NASA, but how they do it? Particularly over such a wide area and perfectly choreographed and timed to perfection. This must have been even more difficult to achieve in the millions of years before computers and NASA existed. I guess they could have faked the photos and bribed the billions of eye witnesses who are still alive?[urlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse_of_July_28,_1851[/url .
Please explain.
Thanks
Coco

Hmmm. Unlike your technique of swallowing whole whatever your delusional mates publish, I considered that video.

Obviously it's a fake, because he's forgotten to put in the stars. CGI bullcrap. Etc.




Sorry, just winding you up, although the reasons no stars are visible in his video is the same as why no stars are seen in The Blue Marble, or in moon photographs.

1. It proves the Earth is a globe, since you tell us that however high we go, our eyes are always level with the horizon - yet at only 73 miles, the view of the curve of the globe is abundantly clear
2. If the Earth were flat then the whole of the flat Earth should be visibletrailing away in all directions. It's not. The local area and some distance in all directions from it can be seen, but no further than that. Exactly what you'd expect, as you go higher, you can see further around the curve of the globe, but still you can't see that far, as the curve of the globe drops away over all horizons.
3. The idiot who made the video thinks that the ground position of the moon (i.e., the place on Earth where the moon would appear directly overhead) means you can only see the moon from there. In fact, the moon is approx a quarter of a million miles away and as such at any given time can be seen from not far off half the Earth.

4. Here's a screenshot of the view of the sky from the approximate launch location, on the date in question, at approximately the time he says the rocket was launched, and from an altitude of 120km. I used the fantastic free resource Stellarium.



What's that thing I see in the south east, easily visible above the horizon? Well, I never. It's the Moon.

Oddly enough, in just the same direction, from the perspective of the launch site, as the "moon dot" on your idiot mate's map.

Epic fail Stan, although not your fault, save for being so gullible; you just uncritically wanted to believe your idiot mate, but it turns out that he has no idea what he is talking about.

HTH

Prescription must have been sorted this week...

Spot The Common Denominators, Then Apply Occam's Razor. ? And it's not the Masonic Hand Signal.

Indeed it's not a Masonic hand signal. Or, it may for all i know, also be one, but what it is on this particular occasion was the Vulcan salute, in tribute to Leonard Nimoy. The image is Samantha Cristoforetti, who lived on the ISS between November 2014-June 2015. The giveaway is she's wearing a Star trek top. Here she is again: She spent 200 days in space, here's a brief article, complete with video of the ISS toilet www.haaretz.com/israel-news/science/1.701324

Indeed it's not a Masonic hand signal. Or, it may for all i know, also be one, but what it is on this particular occasion was the Vulcan salute, in tribute to Leonard Nimoy. The image is Samantha Cristoforetti, who lived on the ISS between November 2014-June 2015. The giveaway is she's wearing a Star trek top. Here she is again: She spent 200 days in space, here's a brief article, complete with video of the ISS toilet www.haaretz.com/israel-news/science/1.701324

I knew Mr Spock was part of the heliocentric Masonic cabal that dictates all aspects of modern life; he had funny ears - dead giveaway.

It's a true art to be able to look at anything and everything and see secrets, symbols, and whatever nonsense a human brain can think up. Rather than realise that what you're looking at is just the carrot section in Tescos. Or a photo of some clouds. Or a man in a beige jumper.

No!

It's the secret societies who keep everything secret. So secret that they just can't resist throwing in some giveaway symbols and imagery just for the 'special' people. For no reason whatsoever. It's all a cover-up I tell you! Except You tube. You tube is magically protected from the secret people who have the power to control the earth, create holograms of the moon and space station, and man the edge of a mathematically impossible disk to stop real people from seeing the edge, for...for...Some equally ridiculous reason. I don't know...But you tube seems to be kryptonite to these powerful secret lizard satanists.

Wonderful lunacy.

Wonderful Lunacy Eh ''Butch''. Well Debunk this then. The [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYo29Si4qf0Moon[/url is its own light source. Lets see who's the Loon now.

Hahaha. Is that your answer. Great Attempted Debunk. Game over.

If I post a link to a YouTube video showing that the moon is made of cheese, does that mean it's true? Because I bet there is one...

like the ISS you mean. The videos are legitimate footage. Proving the Bible's correct analysis of the Moon being its own light source. Check it out for yourself one sunset night. Open your mind and eyes for once.

Remember, youtube is always right.

Trouble is with the devoutly religious is that they see faith as a virtue. When in fact, faith is just a glorification of voluntary ignorance. To believe the moon is its own light source because of a plagiarized bronze-age text in this day and age just amounts to sewing the blinkers on to protect the fact that they've wasted their entire life in nonsense.

It's deliberate ignorance or unfathomable stupidity.

No wrong, it's not always right.But in some case's it's bang on the money. I only post true evidence.

So tell me about your faith. You know that Faith you have in Science. Where the supposed Globe's tilt is 66.6°, and the Moon is supposed to be orbiting the supposed Globe travelling at 666MPH. Oooh them numbers look a bit Masonic to me. Your Faith is Satanic boyo.

Gee Whizz I observe the Moonlight. If you cared to observe the shadows with your own eyes at sunset when the Moon is out, you'd see the shadows don't match up. Just like the video's proved. The Bible supports your observations.

Plagiarised text PMSL.

Why are you so bitter and twisted about God. Something has obviously riled you to have such hatred. I worry for your bitter and twisted soul. Back to your Faith in Darwin, Capernicus, Aristotle, Eratosphenes, Gallileo, Newton and Einstein.Forget about their Masonic routes for a minute, aren't you putting a huge amount of faith into their bogus THEORIES. So in your hypocritical New age world, it just amounts to sewing the blinkers on to protect the fact that you've wasted YOUR entire life in nonsense.

All this time we've been thinking the moon is lit by the sun and along comes YouTube user Lorenzo Acerra with his 2 minute video to completely turn science on it's head. That man must be an absolute genius.