Stan, you are L[size=200YING[/size again. You know, that thing where you deliberately do not tell the truth?

Is this trait a new deliberate ploy, or have you completely lost the plot?

Stan, that is a very poor troll indeed. 0/10

[iTalking of Satellites I'm now going to expose the Satellite myth and prove Sky TV works just like Freeview. Here is a typical mast. With regards to Sky TV being analogue transmitted here is the proof that nails Satellite TV to the coffin.[/i

[iAs you can see Analogue signals are not obsolete. Your freeview box or Sky box transforms the analogue signal to Digital. Now i'm not saying Sky and Freeview carry the same analogue band. They both receive different frequency bands. Here is another piece of evidence Satellite signals are Analogue [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogue_television_in_the_United_KingdomSee Here[/url
Satellites don't exist. Now you show me true authentic photo evidence of your working satellite.I await more CGI Ad Hominem verbal Diarrhea.[/i

Haha.

Stan. Do you even read the links you send? Try reading it again. Analogue and digital are just different delivery methods. Satellite tv used to be analogue (Maybe still is in some parts of the world, I don't know) but they switched to digital because digital is less prone to interference. I'm not sure what the signal type has to do with proving satellites don't exist.

I worked in the military for quite a few years in Intelligence, specifically Imagery-based intel. Stuff from satellite, aircraft, that kind of stuff. How do you suppose those precision weapons, operations planning, encrypted communications, modern avionic systems etc etc work without satellites? I presume the satellite imagery I used to see regularly was just fake?

Get a grip of yourself, Stan.

[iFirstly. We're talking SKY TV. Nothing has ever changed signal wise. The analogue signal recieved through your dish is digitalized through the Skybox. That is simply how it works. Then Sky dial into your broadband and supply the varied package.

Secondly. So called Satellite imagery is through high altitude Drones. Why do the military use drones if Satellites are up there. Durrh. All other communications are Ground based. There's 18 x platforms of ground based technology that can be used singular or entwined. Theres nothing you could tell me about Ground Based Triangulated technology Mr Infantry man.[/iy. Simples.

Great! So, can you explain to me how come a satellite phone will work at the North Pole, then? Or in the middle of the Sahara? Or the Amazon rainforest? Or the middle of the Pacific? Or any other utterly remote place on the globe?

It was phoneline. Durrh.

Military drones are unmanned aircraft that do the very same jobs as normal military aircraft, and that my crazy friend, is all fact from someone who worked with them. Me. The reason we use drones in some instances should be fairly obvious. To do with sensitivity of where they operate and/or the danger posed to human pilots doing the same job. Satellite imagery is from satellites. Not drones. Again, an actual fact for you. To even suggest that UAV's provide coverage of the entire Earth with satellite imagery shows three things.

1. A massive gap in your knowledge, research, and critical thinking.
2. You have to be monumentally stupid or lazy for this to happen by accident.
3. You're being deliberately ignorant.

I don't think you're stupid. I do think your research is lazy and sloppy. But your biggest problem is deliberate ignorance.

By the way, there's nothing you can tell me about aerial and satellite based imagery in the military Mr Armchair liar.

Your Gps will triangulate in most baron places through new tesla radio technology. Look it up. Its quite fascinating.

[iSatellites are more secretive then Drones for reconnaissance. So why use drones. I understand the use of drones instead of manned planes but surely if satellites existed they would be the perfect reconnaissance tool than drones. Seems like i'm talking to drones Mr indoctrinated Infantry man.[/i

Do you even read?

What has the so-called secrecy of satellites got to do with anything? I'm curious as to where your thinking is going. UAV's do the jobs that normal military aircraft do. Bombing, surveillance, BDA, support. They are not satellites. Satellites can't bomb targets, cannot provide certain types of surveillance, or provide support for operations teams. Satellites are essential for the operations of UAV's though. In fact, UAV's couldn't exist without them. How do you think a guy sat in Lincoln can fly a mission over Afghanistan? In real time? Through ground station triangulation? Halfway across the world? In an environment that doesn't even have electricity let alone communication masts.

Which one is it Stan? Deliberate ignorance or breathtaking stupidity? I'm not so sure anymore.

I'm not on about Bombing. I'm on about reconnaissance. Durrh

Once again, read what I put.

Military Satellites can only provide a certain level of surveillance, regardless of what you've seen in the movies. They mainly provide radar coverage over large areas. They can provide optical imagery to a certain scale. That being a large scale. They can only provide optical imagery if there's no clouds and seeing as the planet is pretty much littered with clouds all the time, not a particularly good option if time is a constraint on your work. If you want to plan an operation on the ground or run BDA missions then satellites are no good. They don't have the resolution that can be provided by an aircraft. All 'small' scale surveillance has to be done by aircraft. Some at high altitude some at low. That's how you get the best detail.

Satellites mainly provide communication.

Now, Mr Armchair liar, you could try answering the question I asked instead of avoiding it as usual.

How does a man in Lincolnshire fly a UAV in Afghanistan in real time, if satellites don't exist to provide constant communication of the pilots inputs?

Come on Stan, you can do this! try answering this one question.

He won't. He won't ever answer any straight question. This is why I am certain he's trolling, at least part of the time, though he is clearly delusional.

Now you most certainly know they couldn't possibly have sent full screen full frame-rate video to you down a 1990 phoneline, so why did you even bother, with that embarrassing attempt to rectify your "broadband" mistake, liar?

I know you're a troll and a bit of an idiot but this is just hilarious!

Typical example of a Stanley swerve, when the questions get too hard:-

Reply with something that's 100% irrelevant to the question, which asked about 2-way voice comms via satellite phones working in the remotest locations. Not GPS

So, Stanley, come on, So, can you explain to me how come a satellite phone will work at the North Pole, then? Or in the middle of the Sahara? Or the Amazon rainforest? Or the middle of the Pacific? Or any other utterly remote place on the globe?

Whilst we're on the subject of satellite comms, you know when on TV any report is coming from far countries via satellite link, there is this noticeable delay while the signals go up into space and back down. What's YOUR explanation?

Why do they bother driving a satellite van with a huge fukkoff dish on the roof which they align to the comms satellite?

Clearly there's no Sky phoneline in the broadcast locations- eg desert war zones - so aside from sending fake satellite equipment around the globe for no reason, and presumably paying batallions of engineers to pretend to be using satellite - none of whom has ever spilled the beans that they're not - how do they get the pictures to your screen?

I have only asked this question because I am a bit bored and I hope your answer will be as funny as I think it might

[iIn reply to your angry ad hominem ramblings. Back in the 80's-90's the system was obviously a little different than today. Before the phone landline introduction the workings of the systems went a bit like this. The Sky installer would erect the dish/Aerial. Then cable clip to the Box location. Then to receive the correct package a Sky Chipcard would be inserted into the box giving you your selected package. If an upgrade was required a new card was issued by post or an engineer visit for re- chip your original card to the specific package. See why use chipcards if the Satellite was worthy of allocating packages. Its because they don't use satellites.[/i

You could try answering my question instead of avoiding it, Stan.

How does a guy in Lincolnshire pilot a UAV over Afghanistan in real-time without the use of satellites to relay his inputs?

Bare in mind that most of Afghanistan hasn't got comms towers, even if you could somehow transmit across towers from the UK, across Europe, and into the middle east and beyond in real-time, which you can't.

I'm waiting Mr Armchair liar.

So now i've cleared the TV situation up, you now swerve the diversion to cell phones. Hahaha you're the one calling me a loon and then back-peddle to other topics trying to outdo my knowledge but you fail all the time. If i'm the loon why do you continue to regurgitate immature ad hominem ramblings.. Easy meat.

[iAnd you're another one. More Ad Hominem. Doesn't matter what answer i give. Whether right or wrong i get loon, stupid, idiot. Next thing you're all queuing for my attention. I didn't know idiots were in that much demand. [/i

Swerve again.

You could try answering my question instead of avoiding it, Stan.

How does a guy in Lincolnshire pilot a UAV over Afghanistan in real-time without the use of satellites to relay his inputs?

Bare in mind that most of Afghanistan hasn't got comms towers, even if you could somehow transmit across towers from the UK, across Europe, and into the middle east and beyond in real-time, which you can't.

I'm waiting Mr Armchair liar.

Talking about swerving. How does love evolve from rocks.

[iMore insults. You're Mr Armchair you're never off here. [/i

[iSame as any other Aircraft does triangulation. All aircraft use GPS ground based triangulation.as i already proved earlier in the thread.. simples. [/i