Please remember that the Sunday Sun is owned and run by the same people who deliberately gave Milly Dowlers poor parents hope that their little girl had not been murdered.

Never mind that, remember it's owned by Murdoch.

They are predicting 2 million sales. No doubt 1 million of those will be bought by people hoping to sell them on eBay

It will be the highest selling Sunday paper going forward - not sure what that says about the British public?

No it isn't, the Sunday Sun is a newspaper in Newcastle >

Copyright and Trade Mark Notice © 2012 owned by or licensed to ncjMedia Limited. Sunday Sun™ is a trade mark of ncjMedia Limited. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Statement before using this site

the Sun on Sunday is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who hasn't been accused, tried or convicted for phone hacking/tampering.

but lets not let facts get in the way of some Sin Bin vitriol.

Indeed.

The public aren't sad enough to care?

Don't we all watch rugby on Sky???....who owns Sky???...

Only 39% of it is owned by Murdoch

I admire a man who takes full responsibility for blaming the scandal on everyone one but himself. The last News of the World should have read “You Have No New Messages” not “Thank You and Goodbye”. And it would have been more appropriate for Murdoch to have given the bloke who chucked a pie and yelled insulting names at him his own slot on Fox News not a conviction.

You may, I don't.

I've been boycotting anything Murdoch owned for many years.

To be honest after the tapping of Milly Dowlers we cancelled our sky.

If you don't like it don't buy it. its as simple as that. if enough people feel the same way then it won't last. Totally pointless anyone getting their knickers in a twist about it. Too many people living in glass houses in GB today. especially those of you saying i stopped buying it when.... It was people like you who fed the cash cow and allowed the alledged common practice of hacking, sensationalising journalism etc to flourish. i would hazzard a guess that the entire media world wide is corrupt. inc the good old Guardian.

That's commendable, and it probably gives you a good feeling, but it won't have mattered a jot to the people who you have a gripe against.

I don't condone the actions of those at the News of the World, or indeed all the other newspapers (because they have all been upto wrongdoings, whatever they say), nor do I particularly like Murdoch, but I want a life and if I'm to hold a grudge against all those in the world who don't adhere to my own beliefs, then I'm going to live a very dull existance.

launching any new print newspaper seems about as relevant to me as launching a new steam traction engine, I never buy any newspapers although news websites make up a large proportion of my browsing

I don't buy anything Murdoch related simply due to my dislike of the arrogant, predatory Australian tycoon. He could own anything and I wouldn't buy it.

I feel that all the people pointing the finger at him over the hacking scandal are missing the target by a long way - that must be primarily be the individual editors.

As I say, I just think Murdoch is a c**t

Still watching Rugby League but for free on a Streaming thingy on the computer even though Sky pleaded to me to come back for half price for a year.

The man was guilty of a violent criminal offence, be angry and bitter if you like, I doubt Murdoch, or many other people, care what you think.

politics of envy on the sin bin again, as it always has and ever will be.

Quite apart from anything else, Murdoch has - here as in the States - helped to dumb down the general standard of public discourse. He's not responsible alone, but has played a substantial role in that.

But doubtless such an analysis is "the politics of envy".

And that's without mentioning your apparent approval - or at least lack of any concern - with the not unrelated issue of what we KNOW has gone on at at least one of his businesses.

Is anger at crime and corruption now "the politics of envy" too?

I wonder if any of the Murdochs use mobile phones ?

The owner of the Independent attacks people on live TV.

A lof of Sin Binners read that...

Back to your usual stock-in-trade argument when you can't find anything relevant to say?

Please explain how anything that's been said against Murdoch in this thread, even comes close to a display of envy?

Apparently Murdoch didn't think too much about the "violent criminal offence" either, he didn't support the assault charge but good to see your knack of sensationalism hasn't abandoned you

A violent criminal offence!








So you think hacking phones of dead schoolchildren is ok then?

Personally, I think the bloke who did that was a bloody self-promotional idiot. It deflected attention from Murdoch and even gained him some sympathy on the grounds of his age.

But the idea that Murdoch is some sort of okay geezer or that, if you do not specifically buy his products he doesn't affect you is ... Well, words fail me.