|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1437 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2017 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="DaveO"Well here are a couple of links from rather different sources that explain why running a deficit, permanently, isn't a bad thing.
[urlhttp://www.forbes.com/sites/johntharvey/2012/07/18/why-you-should-love-government-deficits/[/url
[urlhttp://www.social-europe.eu/2010/08/running-a-permanent-fiscal-deficit/[/url
The first one gives a very simplistic view of the economics but is useful in illustrating the point of the effect spending v austerity.
The second is a more sophisticated look at why running a deficit, permanently, is normal (it's what we in the UK have done for literally decades under all governments).
The interesting question is what is our current government up to baring the above in mind? Is it trying to balance the books and in so doing is making everyone (well the majority) worse off when it should be doing things differently?
The idea 0.7% growth vindicates the austerity approach doesn't wash with me. It seems we have had a period where government borrowing was very cheap so had it borrowed for growth promoting investment then as mentioned by the second article the debt becomes self financing. Unfortunately the government has been borrowing at very high levels not to invest but to fund austerity and now the interest rates are increasing the cost of government borrowing is going up. To borrow at the levels it does [inot[/i for investment purposes is madness.'"
The links you provide kind of back up my claims that under the current debt based money system somebody somewhere always has to be going into further debt to keep the whole system functioning. If new money has to be continually spent into the economy why doesn't a government just create this new money themselves instead of borrowing debt based credit money from banks at interest when the same banks create this credit out if thin air?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1437 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2017 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| In answer to my original question I personally think it will be chaos when the debt bubble finally collapses just like Brown envisioned if the quotes ascribed to him are true.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 18063 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Mintball"Adrian Beecroft is a venture capitalist whose business links include Wonga. He is a donor to the Conservative Party – as are the direct owners of Wonga. Beecroft has coughed up around £500,000 – and got to pen a policy document. In essence, calling for it to be made easier to sack people: he claimed that 'a few' people getting sacked simply because their bosses didn't like them would be a price worth paying for 'economic growth'.
[url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/revealed-how-adrian-beecroft-made-a-career-out-of-cutting-jobs-7789303.htmlArticle here about how he has been involved himself in sacking people.[/url Which has obviously done the economy proud.'"
And the difference between the influence his type have on Tory policy and the influence the unions have on Labour policy is what? It is just you find the policies of the right less palatable - the scope of influence is no different, they pay their monies and they expect something in return.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 47951 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2017 | Jul 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Sal Paradise"And the difference between the influence his type have on Tory policy and the influence the unions have on Labour policy is what? ...'"
Rather large.
Just to begin with, the Labour Party was created by the trades unions. It's a little bit of history that seems to be forgotten on occasions, including by some in the (particularly) Parliamentary Labour Party.
I am not aware of the Conservative Party having been founded by loans sharks or, indeed, by multi-national and trans-national business (which are new developments).
Further: trades unions are democratic organisations that have accountable leaderships. For instance, trade union members can elect – and unelect – the leaders of trade unions. In many cases (UNISON is a prime example) members have to opt [iin[/i to any trade union donation. It is not automatic.
I suggest that few consumers have much choice in whether, say, a percentage of their buy in a supermarket then goes to any political party.
So, democracy, accountability – those little matters are quite different.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14522 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2014 | Jan 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Sal Paradise"And the difference between the influence his type have on Tory policy and the influence the unions have on Labour policy is what? ...'"
Oooh ... let me try this one ... is it that the former want to sack people without giving a reason and the latter say you should have a bloody good reason?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 17898 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2020 | Aug 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="El Barbudo"Oooh ... let me try this one ... is it that the former want to sack people without giving a reason and the latter say you should have a bloody good reason?'"
If it was that simple, surely he wouldn't have missed it though
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12488 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2023 | Mar 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
|
Quote ="LeighGionaire"Remember when Lehman Brothers Bank collapsed? Gordon Brown bailed out the banks because this is what he was scared of -
"If the banks are shutting their doors, and the cash points aren't working, and people go to Tesco and their cards aren't being accepted, the whole thing will just explode.
"If you can't buy food or petrol or medicine for your kids, people will just start breaking the windows and helping themselves.
"And as soon as people see that on TV, that's the end, because everyone will think that's OK now, that's just what we all have to do. It'll be anarchy. That's what could happen tomorrow."
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 31362.html
However it was only a stop gap because now we are seeing a Sovereign Debt crisis. All these Austerity measures are hurting the average man financially but we aren't even halting the deficit, never mind actually paying off any Government debt! So if governments were the last resort to save the system what will happen when they eventually go bust and this whole global ponzi scheme collapses?'"
Here is a good site if you are worried.
www.ukpreppersguide.co.uk/catego ... nformation
|
|
Quote ="LeighGionaire"Remember when Lehman Brothers Bank collapsed? Gordon Brown bailed out the banks because this is what he was scared of -
"If the banks are shutting their doors, and the cash points aren't working, and people go to Tesco and their cards aren't being accepted, the whole thing will just explode.
"If you can't buy food or petrol or medicine for your kids, people will just start breaking the windows and helping themselves.
"And as soon as people see that on TV, that's the end, because everyone will think that's OK now, that's just what we all have to do. It'll be anarchy. That's what could happen tomorrow."
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 31362.html
However it was only a stop gap because now we are seeing a Sovereign Debt crisis. All these Austerity measures are hurting the average man financially but we aren't even halting the deficit, never mind actually paying off any Government debt! So if governments were the last resort to save the system what will happen when they eventually go bust and this whole global ponzi scheme collapses?'"
Here is a good site if you are worried.
www.ukpreppersguide.co.uk/catego ... nformation
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 14395 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | May 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote ="LeighGionaire"The links you provide kind of back up my claims that under the current debt based money system somebody somewhere always has to be going into further debt to keep the whole system functioning. If new money has to be continually spent into the economy why doesn't a government just create this new money themselves instead of borrowing debt based credit money from banks at interest when the same banks create this credit out if thin air?'"
It does. What do you think quantitative easing is all about? The new money created that is used in quantitative easing is used to buy government bonds off banks who currently hold them. The price of the bonds goes up because of the increased demand and so the profit made by the banks on the sale of the bonds is new money they can lend.
Normally printing money is inflationary but it rarely is in a recession as explained by the second of the two links I posted.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1437 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2017 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="DaveO"Normally printing money is inflationary but it rarely is in a recession as explained by the second of the two links I posted.'"
But there is plenty of inflation at the moment, the prime example being house prices. Food also has gone up steadily in price over the last few years. Governments's routinely manipulate the data to exclude things like housing in their inflation figures.
From January 2000 up until May 2010 the M4 money supply increased from 802 Billion to 2200 Billion, all that extra money created and I hardly saw a penny of it hit my wallet - so much for the 'trickle down' effect!
www.bankofengland.co.uk/boeapps/ ... C&Filter=N
|
|
Quote ="DaveO"Normally printing money is inflationary but it rarely is in a recession as explained by the second of the two links I posted.'"
But there is plenty of inflation at the moment, the prime example being house prices. Food also has gone up steadily in price over the last few years. Governments's routinely manipulate the data to exclude things like housing in their inflation figures.
From January 2000 up until May 2010 the M4 money supply increased from 802 Billion to 2200 Billion, all that extra money created and I hardly saw a penny of it hit my wallet - so much for the 'trickle down' effect!
www.bankofengland.co.uk/boeapps/ ... C&Filter=N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|