Australian's are keeping their undesirables on an island offshore? It's a good argument for social cycle theory.

As long as they all move out on matchdays, (apart from those buying tickets) I'd reckon the Bulls would be happy to rent out Odsal for the purpose the rest of the time.

What, no freebies ?

Whats the world come to...

The thing is, they are most certainly not all genuine asylum seekers. Some recently even "chose" to go back to where they "fled" as they were going to be processed offshore.

The reason this controversial policy has been brought back, was that they realised that when offshore processing was brought in, the number of boat people dropped a lot. It was actually a deterrent to those economic migrants mixed in with the genuine refugees. When it was abandoned, the numbers of people coming rose sharply. Political parties and opinions aside, the government that got rid of it, have brought it back.

I've been to Odsal on match day, they'd fit right in...

It's OK. People can now come to Australia without any qualifications or being able to speak English. As long as you have a measly $5million. www.smh.com.au/national/wonky-va ... 29sxo.html As for putting asylum seekers and the economic migrants that hide among them slowing the refugee process down, maybe they can be sent to "Sandy Island" in the pacific www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20442487

It's OK. People can now come to Australia without any qualifications or being able to speak English. As long as you have a measly $5million. www.smh.com.au/national/wonky-va ... 29sxo.html As for putting asylum seekers and the economic migrants that hide among them slowing the refugee process down, maybe they can be sent to "Sandy Island" in the pacific www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20442487