Now you've got me worried

Dave K is right though, it does not matter how plausible it sounds you are only posting what you say is true.
Unless it is made public by a club official or Fitzgibbon himself then it is rumour.

Pretty similar to John Dixon saying he never said anything of the sort to Justin Morgan about Berrigan, me and my Business partner know what he said but you will never believe the little Rolf Harris wannabe said it to me unless he went on record on the Cleptic Crusaders website saying so.



Guess if you know it is true about Fitzgibbon you can just toss yoursen off happy tonight safe in the knowledge you have got one over on the FC fans, dont worry about having to prove it Zoddy

Never said we could have signed them, only that we chose not to tender an offer to Berrigan's agent.

Crocker originally want to join Clint at Rovers and Fitzgibbon originally wanted to follow in his Father's footsteps - perfectly logical in both cases.

Why wouldn't I?

Anyway, at least it's now established that Morgan spoke to Dixon about Berrigan...

No, it is established what he said to me and Joe, I think it is perfectly obvious he had spoken to Morgan in the past, same as most coaches have spoke or met at some point

Crocker has the same relevance to Hull FC as Craig Fitzgibbon does to Rovers. So why did the OP start the thread?

To get a few bites...

Because it's...........

Very sad then.

I for one am looking forward to seeing Fitzgibbon play, he has a quality background, and if he only stays one season I hope its an injury free and relatively succesful, I know a hell of a lot of KR fans who wanted Lockyer, so to critisize Fitzgibbons age is a bit OTT, but Mr Moa, now thats another story.

I really dont know, as it wasnt me

Yeah you was too busy dressing up in your lasses knickers!!

Who told you Jimmy?

your lass when I asked why she was not wearing any

Only the same as signing Lovegrove.

but half the weight

I watched Hull v Warrie and you all say you played well in the first half, well if thats your opinion as well then i'll reserve judgement on "your opinion is slightly more educated"

we played well with the team we had out on the pitch...

A vast difference in Rovers favour.

If you say so....

Ok, so cast your mind back to when Lovegrove tore Hull apart down the left wing on his own in the 42-6 win, and then give me a similar example of Moa in his three minute appearances in the few games he has appeared in.





And you can't use Wilfs pant wetting description of "Kingy and Moa were tearing the Rovers team apart down the middle with the Robins reluctant to tackle them" from the reserve game a couple of weeks back when Rovers put out a team of kids.

Damn









I think we should just wait and see, I think Moa will be a good player for Hull, if he got the chance

So to close this, Lovegrove is a proven performer at this level, and up to his injury was by far the most improved player at the club, in a position he isn't built for, in a side that is now sitting in second place.

Moa on the other hand.....

)

In the case of Lovegrove v Moa, we'll just leave it at when fit, one gets picked for the team and the other doesn't.