we need to win to go into next weeks game above fc

I feel the same, I was looking at the table last night and it's a real movers and shakers week.

I'm not sure that Cas and Widnes will have their respected predicted collapses. I think they've got enough points on the board to keep picking up the odd win, rather like us when we finished fourth. (2008?)

The table usually starts to settle down round about now, really big game tonight.

That's exactly why a win tonight is big, we need to be getting some distance on teams whilst they're playing poorly and dropping points.

I'm not saying it isn't important it would be great to win its just not an end of the world scenario to lose

Team for tonight is.

Cockayne
DHodgson
Welham
Salter
Gardner
Burns
Keating
Netherton
JHodgson
Weyman
Larroyer
Cox
Costigan

Langley,Green,Lovegrove,Hall

Oh, what a surprise. getting caned by the ref's again while the other teams gets away with murder. The RFL really don't like us.

Sounded like a bit of dumb rugby, should have took the 2 but think we'd take the draw in the conditions.

Given the biased referee decisions as usual, I'm living ###### off with Rovers with not going for the two when needed. Seems to me Sandercock doesn't have total control over matters on the pitch when it counts. A point, yes. But should of been two.

Cant blame sandercock ultimately its the players who call if its kick or run. Sandy will be furious with that and I'd expect a bit of a roasting

No coach has control over matters on the pitch if players take it on themselves to over rule something as blatant as a kicking tee coming on!
I just hope who ever made that call has learnt a lesson tonight.

Maybe, maybe not. But what ever the coach says, goes. Didn't today. Seems to me a lack of respect of the coaches position to me!

Sat in car park but anyone screaming "take the 2" wasn't here. The wind was strong in our faces, we wouldn't have kicked it, not a chance.

The kick was nearly 40 metres out,sandercock wanted 2,travis didnt fancy the kick against the wind so went for touch.Seeing travis is the kicker he would know his capabilities ,so we have to respect his decision.Any away point is a point gained IMO.

If the coach wants it, then regardless of what ever position your in, it goes!

If the kicker makes the decision because he knows he wont reach you have to go with it,as stan says he had no chance of reaching.

Sandy didn't sound happy with Keating

The commentators on RH couldn't believe they didn't go for it. Ill bow to your better judgement if you was there. But as I heard it, the coach was sending on the kicking tee to go for it. Now who's in charge of the team, Craig or Travis?

Apparently Neil Hudgell has been rushed to hospital following that ferocious bumming from Bentham. The RFL have charged him a grand medical fees to add insult to bleeding injury.

My mate rang me after the game and said it was bang into the wind and sir stan confirms it.I was of the same opinion as you listening to it,but coaches and commentators dont kick goals,travis does.

My point des, is that if it was a forlorn request by Craig, shouldn't Travis of gone for it at least?

In a word, no.

So who is in charge of the team???

If he knows he wont reach he is just giving salford posession.

Wasn't he doing enough of that with his short kicks over the top, instead of kicking deep?

Is it true that you could hear sandy squealing like a pig on the radio commentary?