It's not like you to engage in a conversation, usually make a silly comment then disappear, are you just up late with it not being a school night?
You oviously care about Rovers, the ammount of interest you show on here.

He actually says hell sign England knight's players, (who are infact the best young English players.)

He actually says hell sign England knight's players, (who are infact the best young English players.)

Tbh I'm not going to even bother with you, you came spouting crap and I was daft enough to bite. (once)

What part of it is crap? You know i'm telling the truth, it has been well documented.

I agree, love to see Hall at 6 and Burns at 13.

Plus if thats the deal we have got for Green and Burns, Im over the moon, good bit of business by Rovers IMO

Personally:

1. Hall


6.Burns
7.Dobson

9.Withers


13.Hodgson

What has been well documented is that our truths and yours are different. Our opinion of your opinions of us will be similar to your opinion of our opinions of you. Clear?



Things are always evolving of course. We now say 'prudent' and 'profligate', while you say 'stagnation' and 'ambition'. A change is as good as a rest.

oh - Burns at 6 for me, with Hall at 1. Burns is a bit small for 13, I suspect - plus roopy said he was better at 6 or 9, and he's generally not far off the mark.

What is your first choice back 5 as it stands?

Hall
Latus
Horne
Welham
Hodgson?

I fricking hope its not.

I put "as it stands" though. More signings coming in says Hudgell.

I'd expect Gleeson to form a ginger centre pairing next season. Horne's not had a bad season, but centre he ain't.

Forgot about him. Should be a good missed tackles battle, that, Welham 45 from 275, Gleeson 44 from 244. Maybe Omari Caro to come in too?

Caro is coming in

If latus stays think it will be as back up

Nope to hall at 1 it will be sheriffe cracking little player

No he didn't.

This is what he said, which is what I said.

"They are predominantly young, predominantly English and will be England internationals in the future.

So in the whole interview on humberside he doesn't say that hull fc will be signing England knights players to fill the gaps untill your 15/16s are ready? Pretty sure AP does Dave.

Not sure he says exactley that, saying that so far he has signed watts and arundel two knights players, also I shouldn't have been so picky as I know you were only responding to the hull troll.

To add to this thread your backs are looking very weak especially defensively if that's what you line up with next season.

Just after he talks about the proposed merger of the academies Dave. The bit were he says the 15/16s are great but untill there ready you'll bring in England knights players to fill the gaps.

I shouldn't have bit either with that troll tbh. You are right about our backs too, Gleesons as defensively sound as Welham.

Oh and one other thing Dave, I've not only had to find that AP interview twice, but I've sat through it twice too, thanks a lot pal

It has now been [url=http://www.hullkr.co.uk/on-the-pitch/news/article/burns-on-board=#0000FFofficially announced[/url that Burns has signed a three year deal at Rovers,

...but will miss the first month or so of next season due to his ban.

I'm sure it got changed around the time Danny Williams signed for London.

Yes, thought you had mentioned this before and have just found it on another (locked)Travis Burns thread.

Didnt think the ban carried on over here

What made you think that?