Quick Rovers Phil Brown has just been relieved of his juties get any news out now

Technically O/T, but WTW have confirmed they have received an approach for Brough from Huddersfield.

[urlhttp://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/wildcats-and-danny-brough-i606796.html[/url

Hes been placed on gardening leave

I'm sure some of our friends from over Kirklees way can fill in the gaps, but how are the Giants regards salary cap? DB will not come cheap, they may need to move someone out to make way.

Rumours on the Wakey board that any deal for Brough will include a player exchange, which would offset any cap issues I imagine.

Would be interesting to see who Hudds would let go?

Can Brough and Robinson play in the same team or could Robinson be going to Wakey to play alongside Cooke?

It's only a rumour, and the list of possible players varies wildly.

Robinson is going nowhere. Seems most likely that he'll be moved to Hooker.

Robinson signed a contract extension last week so think it'll be Brough to Hooker.

Lunts doing a decent job there

cant help but think it would be a bad move for Brough to move to a club to play 9. He's a very gifted 7 although his attitude has always been questionable.

Havent Hudds already got Lunt and Faiumu to play 9? (think it's faiumu)

Think you're right, but with Brown at 6, just remembered they've got Drew to come back to 9 as well as Lunt and Robinson tied up for 7 it makes you wonder why they'd want to use a presumably big chunk of cap on Brough.

With Terry Newton banned, Wakefield might want a hooker in part exchange. Drew and Brough didn't really complement each other at Wakefield, so Hudds might want to ship him back. But Wakey just let him go and there might be quota issues. The latter might be true for Faiumu, as well? Can't really see a move for Lunt being in his or Hudds interests.
On the Hudds board there is some speculation that it will be Robinson who is shifted to hooker, rather than Brough. Either way they'd have a surfeit there, you'd think.

Could Rovers be lining one of the Hudds hookers up as part of the move? Cooke to Wakey, Brough to Hudds and someone to Rovers?

Drew, they will ask for dispensation again

Would be a good move by Rovers. I'd play him at 7



Is he not injured though?

wouldn't the quota be a problem?

If Hudds need someone off the cap to fit Brough in, and a suitable exchange can't be found with with Wakefield, it is possible. Unless Murrell reverts to stand-off or loose, I doubt we need a hooker. I suppose Hudds could use Drew as stand-off, making Brown available (unlikely IMO, especially given Drew and Brough's strained partnership at Wakey) or MacNally (more likely - but probably not clearing that much off their cap or giving us someone any more proven than I'anson). The possibilities are almost endless, but most likely IMO, is Cooke to Wakefield and Brough to Huddersfield for cash and a player. Hudds are 1 in 1 out, Wakey 2 in 2 out (including Newton) and we are a man down but a few quid up.
As Hull have done with Raynor's cash/cap space, I'd hold off in case of an emergency or surprise opportunity. This has fallen at a good time for I'anson, assuming his injury isn't serious, so I want to see if he can seize his chance.

Think so, dont think he has played a game this season yet

Drew is a still injured.
Robbo has spelled at Hooker this season when Scott Grix has come one. If brough comes to Huddersfield I doubt we would offload a play-maker - more likely loan out a player for he rest of the season.

WTF have we got FC fans on here discussing a player move between Wakefield and Huddersfield, is there nowt happening worth talking about at the KC

No City have got it booked for their managerial problems this week, FC will use it for theirs when city are finished with it.

Well they have finished blaming the ref for their defeat at Wigan, so the answer is no lol

What was your teams excuse

Cue on the rack at half time....had to be.

and it was the team on the rack after half time Bart.