I'm just letting you know I like Nike socks

Always a risk, doing this - especially recently IMO. Seems to pee them off when their judgement is questioned (feeling some empathy there

). Still, can't see it going worse than 2 games and £[u5[/u00, so probably worth it even as an f-off if he thinks he is innocent.

An appeal? Does this suggest a lack of faith in Hall by Morgan?

Yes, that's exactly it, we're shipping him off the Widnes tomorrow if the appeal is successful.

Craig - no.

Red -

Maybe thinks it's an unjustified ban more like, Morgan Is fair and if he thinks webbo is guilty he wud ave said take it, so maybe there is nothing to suggest the tackle was deliberate.

Funny how in the first part of the charge it states it happened in the 66th minute then in the description of the incident it says the 39th minute?! That is some laying on in the tackle!

Also can see why it is being appealed by Rovers as there is no actual proof it was Jake that caused the problem and could have been caused by Riley himself. It is all circumstantial evidence and no proof.

If he did it then fine ban him I am more than happy with Hall to cover for a couple of games but if there is no proof he did it then I don't see how the RFL can ban him. The officials at the game didnt see it and it sounds like Morgan was even unhappy the penalty was given for slowing the play down as no second movement was made.

you're right... Riley probably did it himself.... there is no proof at all... its not like its on tape and it can be watched.

oh hang on.....



Silly committee..... didn't they know watching the incident proves nothing.

anyway... i think this is one of those things we will never agree on..... maybe after the return fixture at your place we can argue whether Westwood meant to drop onto someone's head with his knees or not.

Time to go... I have socks to wash.

Having just spoken to Jake he has said he did absolutely nothing in the tackle and is why they are appealing. The DVD showed nothing conclusive and only shows that Jake hung on too long and a penalty for slowing the play down. He is off to Leeds tonight again to argue his case. Ok unlikely he'd admit to doing it openly but he genuinly believes he didnt do anything in the tackle.

Just because a player cries out in pain doesnt mean they didnt do it to themselves while they are trying to get up too quickly.

Oh hang on...

Silly Jake...he should have just let Riley get up quickly, play the ball and catch our defence offside because that is what they are trained to do!!!!

Take your tinted specks off and see that maybe all parties are innocent, no lasting damage was done and the RFL are just trying to nip any wrestling holds in the bud to stop it being a focal point all season.

Did he do it because he's cross at going bald?

He'd probably rather be bald than ginger!!!!!

How very dare you, I'm a nice sort of golden colour!

Like they ever get anything right

that's a fair point.

How very dare you there is nothing wrong with Ginger now u take that back right now nasty nasty nick

Only if Welham scores a hatrick on Sunday!!

What that's really unfair what have Ginger people done to you and I'm not a ginge like him it still hurts tho

Collar and cuffs don't match?

What is this pick on ginger day my eye brows are Ginger

Right back on topic everyone pls Jake isn't a nasty player fingers crossed he gets the result he deserves tonight.

more likely to be breaking someones jaw with his track record

Yes ma'am, right away ma'am, sorry for the indiscretion ma'am.

rumour has it he has shares in heinz.... whats a man to do?