pretty hard to prove a rumour

All 3 going could be a good thing if we replaced keating with the scrum half from leigh Ryan Brierley, replace welham with crookes then that leaves us 2 quota spots to get a half back and a hooker, a total restructure of the backs is needed in my opinion even burns so if somebody is willing to pay a transfer fee then take it

Sorry, prove the fact then.

Ryan Brierley now is it? What are we doing now, just naming random players we would like to sign?

not sure about we but i have just named a random player,my opinion obviously but we could realistically afford him and he would do a hell of alot better than our current scrum half,

So, just naming random players who may, or may not, be available.

Didn't realise it was a problem on a fans forum boss

It's not a problem. We all have players we would like to see at Rovers. Just mentioning them doesn't make us anymore likely to sign them.

Good god do not take any notice of rovers mad he will call you Jake next

Strange.

Ok, I think we should sign Sam Tomkins to replace Eden. (Good game this).

Hasn't Welham already been replaced by Goulding?

Ellie?

Cool, I'd still expect to see an improvement in our edge defence.

saints haven't paid a fee since they signed sculthorpe have they? Maybe walsh is crocked for good

Kyle Amor from Wakefield for £50.000

£50k on Amor and we also paid for Alex walmsley but that wasn't much.

Not got a clue Jakey boy have you?

How would you guys feel with him going? I really like him, I think he's quality and he's my man crush

He's bad enough in the Hull 9th/10th place play off. he'd probably explode in a wigan v saints game

As I said ages ago (good guess PAC)Travis is gone end of year & im not even sure if a fee is needed. The get out clause in his contract might just might have made him a free agent if he wanted it.

Which is a right load of knackers.

What is our CEO doing?

In any business, you buy a major asset and allow it to go for free when it fancies a wander down the street?

Sometimes it was easier to support this club when you were stood on the weed strewn terraces of Mount Pleasant wondering why you were killing your Sunday afternoons.

When Sandy left I believe Travis said he would not be exercising his get out clause. It is probably too late now. What information have you that he is leaving anyway. All I have seen is speculation, mainly put out by doom and gloom merchants.

Cannot understand your comment about our CEO as such clauses are a common feature in contracts these days.

We did not buy Travis.

I was probably at Mount Pleasant with you but cannot realistically say those days were in any shape or form better than the present situation.

Well said Keith. Come on Goosey, justify your comments about Travis and stop picking on Mighty Mike.

Anyway, the weeds were better at Belle Vue.

If that's true then it is very disappointing and fans are entitled to ask how Rovers have allowed it to happen.

Assuming that Burns has been continuing to draw his wages, I would tell him that he has failed to exercise any get out clause, that he is still contracted for another year and that the club is unwilling to release him.

Maybe, just maybe if Saints or anyone else want to pay way over the odds then we could consider letting him go on the clubs terms....as long as we can get someone else of similar or better quality. Who knows maybe that is how the club feel too, I'm sure Neil Hudgell would not roll over and let Burns go for nothing.