I didn't write or read those and I can't be d to go into them.


A Rovers fan asked the question about Mickey Paea going on report so I courteously gave him the detailed answer;
"Right in front of me as was all the play near that quarter of the pitch.

Mickey tackles Hauraki over the top of his shoulder

Hauraki stays down.

The Cas fans shout for Mickey to get penalised for a swinging arm / head high shot.

Roby and the lines man conspire to give Cas the penalty for a swinging arm / high shot.

Hauraki walks off holding his arm which indicated his injury had nothing to do with Mickey's tackle.

Weak decision from weak officials under a weak system".


Again, the full context of the comment;
"To say it was another gutless performance is total and utter bollox - the players gave their all.

The lack of possession in the second half was the most heavy against I've ever seen in watching Rovers for 20 years.

We got in their 20 four times and scored 3 times and I'd bet our tackle success percentage wasn't that bad. It was the lack of possession killed us.

Some of the high tackles were justified penalties but the one in the second half when the Cas player was tackled across the torso, Roby let it go, then as we're about to play the ball, the lines man gave in to the home crowd and ordered a penalty was the crack that bust the damn.

We need 2 refs in the game ASAP IMO".


No it's not.

When all's said and done, I am a Rovers supporter, posting about Rovers topics on Rovers boards.

Where as you are continually unable to escape the parasitical tendencies which control you.

Why claim this, then? Poor research

.

Look, it's fairly clear you're painted into a corner in your Sandercock cheerleader outfit and are seeking to cite the pitch width, lack of continuity aka injuries, the referee and unjust penalties as mitigation for losing to the bottom team. When FC were in a similar position it was a "culture of excuses" in your opinion. Hypocrisy.


Apart from multiple posts just this morning (with pictures!), about [uHull FC[/u on the Rovers board, in clear contravention of Mild Rover's guidelines set out earlier in the thread, you mean? Highly inflammatory tone also, I note. Really no need at all. Refreshing diversion, perhaps.

Ah, the personal insults last resort. Chin up, cockle, Wigan next.

In your rush to enhance your reputation of being a complete w@nker, you appear to have quoted the wrong post. Pr1ck.

Nobody's listening.

No, I didn't but you're too dumb to realise

Yeah just how do you defend your line for 80 mins ? Perhaps we should attack the opps line when we have the ball ??? #Idea?

She should changer her name to Mrs Boreista

YAAAAAAAAAAAWN

I agree with Zod

One of the high tackle penalty's was awarded on the back of the Castleford crowd kicking up a fuss. It took him a good 5 seconds to make the decision.

you are Joe Dolce

HAS the FC board shut down they all seem to be on hear

And that's unusual ??

The length of time to award it was almost as laughable as our performance. Fair play to Castleford they made plenty of yards without much effort.

Cheer up, kidda. At least you beat us at Wembley thirty-three years ago.

You are forgetting the 12 other times since entering SL
8 easy points was the phrase of the day back in 2007.


You din't tell us that you meant over 3 seasons.

That was the tipping point of the game because initially Roby saw nothing wrong with it and only blew up once the Cas player was about to play the ball.

What have you got to show for them apart from a somewhat sad clock?

What is the average length of a super league pitch?

"Average" would be just under 100 metres, as there are a 2 or 3 that have under sized pitches. Maximum size is 100x68 metres.

But why would you ask?

So, you quote a post with no relevance to your comment and I'm the one who is dumb?
You really are a strange one.

And what clock would that be?

You really think we are performing as well as we can with what we have? And that someone else couldnt have us playing a bit better?

With this squad - no, not quite. But not a million miles away tbh. A bit better, as you say.There have been too many really bad performances. To me 12 wins looked about par, with a shot at 8th. The squad was too thin and young to expect much more, though you always hope. We're roughly on course for that.

A starting front row yesterday of Carlile, Beaumont and Walker, with Cox, Green and Griffin on the bench. Plenty of potential, but not one of those would count as a seasoned SL player, yet, IMO.

This is it.

Many fans expectations are way out of control for the level of inexperience we have in the squad.

The reason why some of us Sandercock supporters think he's worth persevering with is because we can see that under his guidance, the likely hood of say for instance the 6 player MR has named above, will improve out of sight if given another couple of years.

Time for some folk to wake up and smell the coffee.

This is it.

Many fans expectations are way out of control for the level of inexperience we have in the squad.

The reason why some of us Sandercock supporters think he's worth persevering with is because we can see that under his guidance, the likely hood of say for instance the 6 player MR has named above, will improve out of sight if given another couple of years.

Time for some folk to wake up and smell the coffee.

After hearing mainly top reports of Greg Eden's performances seems puzzling that the coach would drop him for a utility player in Hall.