The back to back challenge cup winning, current warrington player of the season, 2010 SL dream team second rower?

He's doing well... thanks for asking.

So Websters tackle cant have been down to poor technique? No need in calling the guy when you cant possibly tell if it was deliberate or not!

I have involved in a tackle like this, only the once like. Tackled a guy around the legs a slipped back down to the ankle, then some other player came in and twisted the player. Yes the lad was hurt but not to bad(just walked it off)but these things happen and it was a pure accident.


Get a grip!

Good to hear, lets hope he doesn't add to this list in the forthcoming months, now that he is too busy counting medals to consider high shots or dropping on opponents with his knees.

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary?player=Ben+Westwood&club=Warrington&from_day=&from_month=&from_year=&to_day=&to_month=&to_year=&league=&charged=&search=search[/url

So if rovers are appealing will the hearing be pretty soon

Quote ="Rupert Pupkin"So Websters tackle cant have been down to poor technique? No need in calling the guy when you cant possibly tell if it was deliberate or not!'" If it wasn't deliberate why have the RFL charged him doing it deliberately? Have you even read the charge? www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2345 Oh look they have charged him with the exact thing i watched him do. oh look he has previous for 'an almost exact similar offence'. Dont worry... im getting a grip as you read this.

Quote ="Rupert Pupkin"So Websters tackle cant have been down to poor technique? No need in calling the guy when you cant possibly tell if it was deliberate or not!'" If it wasn't deliberate why have the RFL charged him doing it deliberately? Have you even read the charge? www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2345 Oh look they have charged him with the exact thing i watched him do. oh look he has previous for 'an almost exact similar offence'. Dont worry... im getting a grip as you read this.

Of your sock?

Donnay special

oh no.... this is terrible news.

oh well.

More of a Patrick kinda guy myself but each to there own.

Patrick !! why would i want to go and ruin my best pair?

Like Morgan says in his statement as long as the RFL are consistent in matters like these then he is all for high tackles going against the player, now let's see if a different panel see things differently then we will see how consistent they are. And nope it Nike for me

I'm sure he didn't mean it really....hopefully the RFL will do the right thing and rescind the suspension.

Well we will see how consistent they are if he is banned then fairy snuff we have cover there .

Erm, Ranga, unless you've had a very quick set of treatment and operation, you haven't got a cock.

[url=http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/sport/HULL-KR-Rovers-appeal-Webster-s-match-ban/article-3258014-detail/article.htmlRovers to appeal[/url

He didn't, he was trying to get a closer look at Riley's boots as he found them rather fetching.

I'm just letting you know I like Nike socks

Always a risk, doing this - especially recently IMO. Seems to pee them off when their judgement is questioned (feeling some empathy there

). Still, can't see it going worse than 2 games and £[u5[/u00, so probably worth it even as an f-off if he thinks he is innocent.

An appeal? Does this suggest a lack of faith in Hall by Morgan?

Yes, that's exactly it, we're shipping him off the Widnes tomorrow if the appeal is successful.

Craig - no.

Red -

Maybe thinks it's an unjustified ban more like, Morgan Is fair and if he thinks webbo is guilty he wud ave said take it, so maybe there is nothing to suggest the tackle was deliberate.

Funny how in the first part of the charge it states it happened in the 66th minute then in the description of the incident it says the 39th minute?! That is some laying on in the tackle!

Also can see why it is being appealed by Rovers as there is no actual proof it was Jake that caused the problem and could have been caused by Riley himself. It is all circumstantial evidence and no proof.

If he did it then fine ban him I am more than happy with Hall to cover for a couple of games but if there is no proof he did it then I don't see how the RFL can ban him. The officials at the game didnt see it and it sounds like Morgan was even unhappy the penalty was given for slowing the play down as no second movement was made.

you're right... Riley probably did it himself.... there is no proof at all... its not like its on tape and it can be watched.

oh hang on.....



Silly committee..... didn't they know watching the incident proves nothing.