Only time will tell, but never is a bold statement

Is this the same "never" that was in "Hull KR will never play in Superleague"

I suppose he could if the 10 or so in front of him were all injured, plus graham will take up the ginner quota for the forseeable future

Dunno, I never said that

About as bold as saying I'll never win the lottery or cop off with girls aloud

I never said you did

So how can I possibly answer your question.

I'll rephrase it

welham will never play for england/gb unless there's a massive injury crisis affecting the dozen or so better English centres or unless his dad gets the England coaches job.

Is that better?

You dont get the point do you

name the 12 better english centres, they're all shoyte at international level anyway.

I wouldn't have him in the [icurrent[/i England squad (it is too early to judge the trajectory of him career, IMO), but a couple of neutral judges on the VT have mentioned him as one of those who might feel hard done by after Chris Bridge became the seventh (7!) Warrington player in Tony Smith's train-on squad.

Who were they then? simon cowell and cheryl cole?

hall
briscoe
yeaman
senior
smith
gleeson
watkins

That's 7 from 3 clubs. I'll stop thinking about it now or he'll be even further down the pecking order

on last years form, get your head out of that glue bag. there is'nt 12 decent english centres in sl.

Totally agree but there's still at least 12 better than welham

like i said before, name them! (without been stupid).

Atkins, Shenton and Clubb spring to mind. Still dont fancy our backs against the Aussies though!

still not 12 is it! i would'nt fancy our chances against france with their aussie recruitment.

Ilisted 7 from 3 clubs, someone else listed another 3. You need to take your ginner glasses off. He's OK but there are plenty better

It will make France competitive if they are allowed to play but i dont agree with the rule if they are allowed. Sends out the wrong message to young French rugby league players wanting to play international RL not to mention the simple fact that they are not French!

thats 10 mate, dumb and dumber need to engage brain before typing!

Has anybody mentionned Lawrence at the Giants? He is young with a big future.

Welham at this moment in time is ahead of Hall purely on the basis that he didnt need to go out on loan to a lower league club to rebuild his confidence.
Welham is a great reader of the game.
His pace isnt blistering but he isnt the sloutch some on here are making him out to be.
His try scoring record is 1 every 2 games which in SL is above average.
Defensively he needs to improve but he will.
People are forgetting he made his break through at aged 21 not 17, 18.
Therefore he still has improvement in him.
And he has caught the eye of Tony Smith this season so maybe one day he might get Rep honours.

ratu?

I like Welham as a player and think he had still got improvement in him however I would say Hall has far more potential and natural ability.

If you were offered a straight swap which player would you honestly take?

but its ok for england to do it
ie fasavalu, bridge and harrison

there is and has been plenty of examples in league in recent times, so to deny these would be wromg of the league authorities ,unless they are willing to go through each squad and make sure that they are representing their country of birth.