Quote ="Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006"tell that to justin www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views'" He ought to have kept his mouth shut as he's just made himself look bitter and stupid with those remarks. For the 'full speed replay' merchants on this thread - on the SLE show it was reported that Smith said he thought it was a knock-on right from the start and just used the slow-mo to be absolutely sure.

Quote ="Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006"tell that to justin www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views'" He ought to have kept his mouth shut as he's just made himself look bitter and stupid with those remarks. For the 'full speed replay' merchants on this thread - on the SLE show it was reported that Smith said he thought it was a knock-on right from the start and just used the slow-mo to be absolutely sure.

clearly, after 17 replays

Got to say it was lucky for Leeds the cameras were there.

whether it was or it wasnt, youll see worse trys awarded over the season

It wasnt his hand it was his knee. I should know, I saw it full speed from directly behind from the south stand. Dont believe me, ask the guy next to me on the grassy knoll, he saw it clearly through his rifle sight.

you WILL see worse given this season, if we had been 20 points up I think it might have gone our way, but with it being a game winner in a tight game I think the benefit was given to Leeds, who then went on to score and win.

Indeed and if it wasn't a tv match I am sure that both his and Donalds would have been given, however as there was a video ref both were referred 'upstairs'.

Touches it or not, try or not! makes no odds, Leeds would have still beaten your lot. Think yourselfs lucky the ref kept you in the game so long with the persistant biased penalty blowing in your favour.

There was no benefit of the doubt needed. It was clear to see on the replay the ball rotation change when his hand hit it. If there wasnt a video ref it would have been given as a try but thats what VRs are for isnt it, to disallow tries that should be disallowed?

Quote ="Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006"tell that to justin www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views'" Morgan in rank hypocrisy shocker Hull KR coach Justin Morgan brushed off Steve Ganson's controversial late decision that led to his side's match-winning try in the derby game with Hull FC in Cardiff. "It is what the referee says. We have been on the end of good and bad calls all season," he said. "Everyone is on the end of bad calls. It's what's gone in the little box at the end of the day and it's us that got two points. That's all that matters.

Quote ="Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006"tell that to justin www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views'" Morgan in rank hypocrisy shocker Hull KR coach Justin Morgan brushed off Steve Ganson's controversial late decision that led to his side's match-winning try in the derby game with Hull FC in Cardiff. "It is what the referee says. We have been on the end of good and bad calls all season," he said. "Everyone is on the end of bad calls. It's what's gone in the little box at the end of the day and it's us that got two points. That's all that matters.

Have to say, I thought it should have been BOD. While he probably did, you can't conclusively say that he touched the ball with his hand.

FFS it was last season - get over it.

Anyway, the ball hit berrigan's left forearm.

I am over it. I was pointing out Morgan's hypocrisy. He admitted it was a bad call by Ganson in Cardiff but said you get good and bad calls and have to live with it. This in a situation when Rovers won by 5 points.

Rovers get a bad decision against them and lose by 8, and a "bad call" (which was actually correct) is then entirely blamed for the defeat. Is that entirely consistent, in your opinion?

Not really. If the cameras weren't there then Donald and Senior would've probably been given tries before that anyway.

How the hell is it hypocracy, the call at MM last season was GOOD, the one on Friday was BAD.

Sounds like the truth to me.

On the one hand he's saying a bad call is immaterial in the context of a game, these things even themselves out and are irrelevant. When Rovers win by 5.

On the other he's saying one bad call, which was actually a good call, is the entire reason for a result. When Rovers lose by 8.

No it wasn't.

Get over it.

I didnt quite see it that way !!!!!

It was knocked on, if that had been Leeds and it had been given, I'd have been pi$$ ed off.

If it had been Leeds its WOULD have been given dont worry about that

That's a whole different subject, and I agree.

Didn't Senior and Donald have tries disallowed?

Put brain in gear before posting, it makes you look less of an idiot.

Seniors And Donalds were more clear cut

Put brain in gear before posting it makes you look less of an idiot

No they weren't, all three were clear to the video ref.

Websters was the only one that could have been given B.O.T.D