I think the lack of appeal and Justin's article in the HDM says a lot TBH, The RFL are still an inconsistent set of t#ssers anyway!

I dont get the HDM much now it's only 4 pages long and Justin probably thinks it's not worth appealing we've tried before it don't work, and your right they are full of head doers.

hes done something he shouldnt have, hes been caught, end of, do the 2 match ban.
as Morgan said though, the RFL have to be consistent and pull all of these dangerous tackles up.

Are head high tackles a sh*thouse thing to do?

Talking of Sh*thouses how is Ben Westwood these days..




Webster obviously did something, can't say I saw it myself but he's been banned so we'll either appeal or Hall will get his chance.

No Ben Westwood is a saint never does out wrong

Not if it's on Yeaman.

Aye...two-handers!

they can be, yes... But they can also be just badly timed, or down to poor technique.

There is no scenario in which trying to twist a tackled players foot round the back of their leg is though...

So what's your point?

The back to back challenge cup winning, current warrington player of the season, 2010 SL dream team second rower?

He's doing well... thanks for asking.

So Websters tackle cant have been down to poor technique? No need in calling the guy when you cant possibly tell if it was deliberate or not!

I have involved in a tackle like this, only the once like. Tackled a guy around the legs a slipped back down to the ankle, then some other player came in and twisted the player. Yes the lad was hurt but not to bad(just walked it off)but these things happen and it was a pure accident.


Get a grip!

Good to hear, lets hope he doesn't add to this list in the forthcoming months, now that he is too busy counting medals to consider high shots or dropping on opponents with his knees.

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary?player=Ben+Westwood&club=Warrington&from_day=&from_month=&from_year=&to_day=&to_month=&to_year=&league=&charged=&search=search[/url

So if rovers are appealing will the hearing be pretty soon

Quote ="Rupert Pupkin"So Websters tackle cant have been down to poor technique? No need in calling the guy when you cant possibly tell if it was deliberate or not!'" If it wasn't deliberate why have the RFL charged him doing it deliberately? Have you even read the charge? www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2345 Oh look they have charged him with the exact thing i watched him do. oh look he has previous for 'an almost exact similar offence'. Dont worry... im getting a grip as you read this.

Quote ="Rupert Pupkin"So Websters tackle cant have been down to poor technique? No need in calling the guy when you cant possibly tell if it was deliberate or not!'" If it wasn't deliberate why have the RFL charged him doing it deliberately? Have you even read the charge? www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2345 Oh look they have charged him with the exact thing i watched him do. oh look he has previous for 'an almost exact similar offence'. Dont worry... im getting a grip as you read this.

Of your sock?

Donnay special

oh no.... this is terrible news.

oh well.

More of a Patrick kinda guy myself but each to there own.

Patrick !! why would i want to go and ruin my best pair?

Like Morgan says in his statement as long as the RFL are consistent in matters like these then he is all for high tackles going against the player, now let's see if a different panel see things differently then we will see how consistent they are. And nope it Nike for me

I'm sure he didn't mean it really....hopefully the RFL will do the right thing and rescind the suspension.

Well we will see how consistent they are if he is banned then fairy snuff we have cover there .

Erm, Ranga, unless you've had a very quick set of treatment and operation, you haven't got a cock.

[url=http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/sport/HULL-KR-Rovers-appeal-Webster-s-match-ban/article-3258014-detail/article.htmlRovers to appeal[/url

He didn't, he was trying to get a closer look at Riley's boots as he found them rather fetching.