Maybe more noticable as the JJB is up to the max allowable rake where as the North looks to be a lesser rake.

Without a measuring stick im sure we wont ever know exactly

Nothing to apologise for,and please direct me to where I slagged you off!

I posted all the info that was available and upto date at the time and in good faith, 5 weeks ago that still was the case, we met on monday, I actually chaired the meeting, where the current info available was that due to problems with the M&E (mechanical and electrical) and late changes to the enterprise pods, which held up flooring the project would be delayed, no one was privy to that info when I posted the 29th July as the completion date.

Please remember I am not doing this to attack anyone, but only to keep the fans up to date as information is sometimes hard to come by for some.

The financials have been done to death so I will not be responding to anymore questionson that front, but will gladly answer any surrounding the build project, re timetables or design features.

It's a blue colour. When is it going to be painted red?

I've a ferw questions.

1) Is the big piles of dirt and the muddy areas behind the stadium going to be moved and the area landscaped. It's a right mess as it stands?

2) In the documents on the planning website it mentions that the current access to the East stand is also going to be improved as this is part of the access to the North can this nggot be done as a priority now. Current access is awful?

3) Are we going to spell anything out with the seats?

4) How many hospitality boxes will be created for match days?

Thanks Phil.

I was at the forum last night as with regards to access for the east stand he club have been told the access to the eaststand will be in a much better state for the next home game.
Also I remember Smith saying there would be 10 boxes in the North stand. Hope this helps a little bit

As Sandra says, it's a blue colour. If its then painted red, when will it be painted white?

The clubs fix will probably be to throw gravel at the problem. It needs tarmacing.

Mechanical and Electrical

It's too late to cancel the order apparently:

Nice.

Tarmacing was the reply not gravel.

Won't that be saved for when he funds the south stand build?

I was there it was me that asked the question and tarmac was the reply.

Sorry i meant the "Larvin" being wrote across the stand on the seats.

Ah fair enough sorry.

I raised the colour at the last meeting, and was informed that was the colour to match the Grey/blue on the back of the RM stand, what they didn't know is that the RM was to have a makeover, as a result NPS are getting quotes to have the ancillery building resprayed, So white it will be (eventually).

I'm sorting Easty's request by PM as a number of drawings invoved (I don't know how to post them

)
He may well wish to share on here.

Thanks to Phil Webster for the following Pictures.


Under the Stand

1st Floor west stand.

Exec boxes

View from the foot bridge

Fixing roof struts

1 of 2 top floor bar areas

Top Floor west stand


Seats

Phil has kindly sent me some plans. I'll add them also if people wish to see them?

Great stuff Kev.

Easty

What happened to the files you tried to post?

Perhaps it's a Hull City councillor thing. Who can forget Phil's erstwhile colleague Colin Inglis' insistance on proceeding with the "structure" (can't call it sculpture or art) locally known as "Three tits and a cock"?
....sadly past it's newborn peak and neglected and foul(er) than before. Barely a dribble can be forced from it's mastitis-infected nipples, tiles are now sp, discarded fag-ends clog it's gullies like a 1970's carpet and the light pulsing from the end of the tower is no more. What a fantastic waste of public money.

Still, Inglis has previous. He, of course, unlilaterally spent nearly £700,000 of Hull taxpayers' money on the infamous [url=http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Inglis-criticises-big-screen-switch/story-11970447-detail/story.html#axzz2K9FHoTXI"Big Screen" debacle[/url. Installed without consultation with his fellow councillors, it was brought down by the LibDems as they seized power. Political points scoring or rational austerity, Lib Dems? Well, as the money had been spent and it was in place anyway, and having winessed the scenes at a typical Hull City Council meeting, I suspect the former.

But I digress. It lay destitute in a warehouse, a futureless but valuable elephant, until Labour retook power. Quicker than you could say "Nowt nor Summat" the [url=http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Giant-screen-enhance-fans-day/story-13542170-detail/story.html#axzz2K9FHoTXIscheme was hatched for Rovers[/url to rent it from the council for their new scoreboard. Yet still it lingers. What happened to the plan, or is it to be incorporated into the new stand? Phil's the finance portfolio holder, isn't he? I wonder if he brokered the deal. He'll know if it's still going ahead, I bet.

Site i uploaded with had a 50mb download limit I'll add them another way later.

Wormy, can't believe you used "structure" when you could have slid "erection" in. What a cock-up.

ERDF is an EU body, right? Blimey.
[urlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/9628535/EU-demands-an-extra-11.5bn-from-British-taxpayers.html[/url

Let's hope the delay to 9th September, coincidentally the end of the season-ish, doesn't push back the repayment schedule. Interest on the prudential borrowing won't pay for itself, you know.

Sorry if that was for Phil's eyes only ...

However, the big screen was part of the ill-fated 'Golf Stand' move to the south end. As that failed, I guess there was no point in the end.

Also seem to remember some people saying the screen itself was useless in terms of it's output and tech stuff like that.

GIVE IT A FUCKING REST WOMAN.

How rude. I'm on topic and your photographs of red seats and fences and so forth have filled 246 pages.