YES

But you are also 1oo% sure you would have beaten Warrington last night so

No, about 75% actually.

Which proves you know fook all about fook all

I think we should be grateful to have TWO clubs in Super league,as it seems to get up a lot of peoples noses.

Correctamundo.

Thats brilliant mate well done.

Wire would have hammered you pal.

No a later one.

Mine (like everyone else's) opinions vary throughout the season so I figured you'd choose a suitable quote from your database (like anyone could but they're not as sad as you).

I can say that before the season started, I said you would not finish in the play-offs and I was proved [u100%[/u correct.

Anyone can change their mind every few weeks, make wildly fluctuating claims and then say at the end of the season they were right all along. No credibility in that, son.

Before the season started, I was one of very few people who knew how your team was.

Opinions will fluctuate throughout the season but credibility lies within my prediction before a ball was even kicked.

So if you were so utterly convinced of your ability to predict the league placings at the end of the season, why make such wholesale changes 4 weeks in? Self-doubt creeping in, or just hedging your bets?

I did it on purpose to see if you took the bait and it looks like I've been proved right - again!

OK, keep believing that if it makes you feel better. When can we expect the definitive Zod prediction for 2010? Do let me know so I can bookmark the right version.

February 2010.

You can also give a prediction of how many times you'll mention injuries next season as well with Dad's Army coming.

A lot. You heard it here first. You do know the average age of our squads is the same, don't you? And that's excluding Aizue and Gene.

Fitz and Long will do for me if they do the biz.Couldnt give a toss if they are 40 in that case.

Of course, I work it out every time there is player movement at each club.

So you agree the Dad's Army comment is an irrelevance, what with you having Galea and Fozzard on the books to balance out Long and Fitzgibbon?

Long is a very very poor signing.

Based on what?

his current vision impairment(although to be fair this problem arose after the signing)

The fact he's 33 and had 12 hard years of SL on the clock.

I worry that MRs B's injury-barometer goes through the roof and the forum server goes into meltdown...

Think his SL years haven't been that hard to be fair!

He has been playing in a great side for most of it, he is now 32 and will be playing in a much weaker side in 2010, I doubt he will be as effective has he has been in the past, especially if his eye stays open

(oh sorry he wont be able to

will he)