Surely any wages he's on would be seperate from any testimonial?

Yes, that's the point. Bertie says he's on the same salary for the next 2 years as he's on now. So when you add in the fact that he's also eligible for testimonial that's all incremental money so in real terms he's getting a lot more money. According to Bertie, anyway.

I'm starting to get a little baffled. Anyways had my ringtons tea delivered with my favourite shortcake biscuits so the less confused the better as i'm now heading into indulgement(sp) mode.

Like Radford with his wheelbarrows of cash.

Not from Rovers atleast.

£180,000 is several wheelbarrows worth, not enough for our poor donkey.

Leeds still favs according to the experts....

Which experts are these?

Quoting your self? Are you a boxer?

Promised wouldn't say....

Ruddy hard work keeping up with you lot, your Avian prejudice is well noted. Currently watching "The Ring", American version, bluddy rubbish so far, off for a fag is it worth sticking with or should I go back to "Conan The Barbarian?"

Good job I'm not Bertie or I'd be demanding a link.

Here is some erotica to cheer you up:

[urlhttp://www.treknature.com/gallery/North_America/Canada/photo59915.htm[/url

Actually I just made it up - I really should be out having fun tonight rather then causing mischief on here, sorry.

You won't let up on this magical £180,000 figure will you.

I'm an Emperor Goose, from Kamchatka so that doesn't really do it for me, although (and I hope none of my far Eastern brethren are looking) I must admit to being mildly stimulated by your pictures.

Not doing much on the film review front though.

"The Big Lebowski" it is.

My favourite singer plays one of the nihilists in that movie. Brilliant film.

Figures obviously don't come to easy to her




Can't wait for the spin when Radford and maybe Dowes stay because both Feilden and LMS turn them down ( because, of course the strict new salary scheme applies ( to some ).....and the poor deluded tooth extractor spins the cabbages a yarn about them being stronger

ive ad it from masons big mate,if leeds get near rovers offer he will go there he wants to go to a top 4 club and sees leeds as the bigest club whos currently in for him and his best option ,the 180,000 i think that offer is in aussy dollers, if fc was in the market for a overseas prop then he would have been our player for dead sertain ,why rovers make there interest known about players is stupid ,they would be better keeping there council til they have signed one ,but its a fact that if rovers do sign this calibre of player they will have to go all out and bust the bank due to them being unfashionable and no pedigree in SL ,you may not agree with that but its true and deep down you know it

Jeeps and i thought my English was bad. Leeds aren't interested in Mason according to there own supporters who are normally pretty spot on regards signings. TBF i think you must have visit a tinternet cafe on day release from the hospital.

At least I have a link. Your link to Radford maintaing his current salary and adding a testimonial is long overdue. Bit like some other numbers that should be in the public domain by now.

1. I agree that its stupid to go public, but Mason was the source of the story, and how long could Rovers credibly deny interest given his well-publised statements?

It would be a bit stupid to (for example) announce it on your official website only for it to fall through. Ring any bells?

2. Rovers won't "break the bank". I will let you in on a little secret. Salary Cap. There, I've said it.

3. Having a "pedigree" in SL, what's that all about then? I suppose it involves some sort of SL trophy track record. Maybe its something you have read about elsewhere.

i remember Hull a few years back declaring there interst in both Mason and Petro Civeneciva, did either of them sign???

Not saying Mason isn`t good on the pitch,but he is a bigger loose cannon than Hame.